[2017] KEELC 3762 (KLR)
The court found that the respondent had been given adequate time to prosecute the preliminary objection but failed to comply with the court's orders of 29.11.16. No plausible explanation was provided for the non-compliance. Exercising its discretion, the court declined to grant further time and directed that the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEELC 3762 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Eric Mutwiri Kinyua; Respondent: Kirai M'Mweria
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- ? 18 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- Preliminary objection disregarded; matter to proceed as if preliminary objection is not on record.
- Judges
- LN Mbugua
- Legal Topics
- Adverse Possession, Limitation of Actions, Preliminary Objection, Land Title Disputes
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Eric Mutwiri Kinyua
Applicant
Kirai M'Mweria
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent's preliminary objection should be allowed or the matter should proceed without it.
- 2 Whether the respondent complied with the court's orders of 29.11.16 regarding prosecution of the preliminary objection.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondent had been given adequate time to prosecute the preliminary objection but failed to comply with the court's orders of 29.11.16. No plausible explanation was provided for the non-compliance. Exercising its discretion, the court declined to grant further time and directed that the matter proceed as if the preliminary objection was not on record. This decision was based on the need for efficient administration of justice and adherence to court orders.
Court Disposition
Preliminary objection disregarded; matter to proceed as if preliminary objection is not on record.
Orders
- The matter shall proceed as if the preliminary objection is not there.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
18 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU
ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT
CIVIL SUIT 18 OF 2015 (OS )
IN THE MATTER OF SECTION 37 & 38 OF THE LIMITATION OF ACTION ACT
AND
IN THE MATTER OF ADVERSE POSSESSION OF LR. ABOTHUGUCHI/GITHONGO/1147
ERIC MUTWIRI KINYUA ….........APPLICANT
VERSUS
KIRAI M'MWERIA ….................RESPONDENT
R U L I N G
I find that the Preliminary Objection is dated 04:04:16 and it was filed on 15:04:16. Respondent was given adequate time to prosecute the said Preliminary Objection. No. plausible explanation has been advanced as to why the orders of 29. 11. 16 were not complied with. As such, I decline to grant any more time. Instead, I direct the matter to proceed as if the Preliminary Objection is not there.
DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT AT MERU THIS 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2017 IN THE PRESENCE OF:-
C:A Mungai/Kananu
W. P. Mburugu for Applicant
Muthamia h/b Mokua for the Respondent
L. N. MBUGUA
JUDGE