[2018] KEELC 903 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 903 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff had lawfully acquired the suit land through a valid sale agreement and transfer executed by a person holding a proper power of attorney from the registered owner. The evidence established that the plaintiff was the registered proprietor, and the defendants' occupation was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 903 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Erick Kiplangat Cheruyoit; Defendant: Richard Masoi and 33 others
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Narok
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 262 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Land and Property Suit / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiff; permanent injunction and eviction orders granted; costs to the plaintiff.
Judges
MN Kullow
Legal Topics
Eviction, Trespass, Ownership Dispute, Power of Attorney, Title Registration
Source Language
en
Land and Property Eviction Trespass Ownership Dispute Power of Attorney Title Registration

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Erick Kiplangat Cheruyoit

Plaintiff

Richard Masoi and 33 others

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land and Property Suit / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the power of attorney held by Elizabeth Chepkirui Ngeny was valid and conferred capacity to transfer the suit land.
  2. 2 Who is the lawful owner of the suit land.
  3. 3 Whether the defendants are trespassers on the suit land.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff had lawfully acquired the suit land through a valid sale agreement and transfer executed by a person holding a proper power of attorney from the registered owner. The evidence established that the plaintiff was the registered proprietor, and the defendants' occupation was unauthorized, as their alleged purchases were not supported by valid sale agreements or proper transfer of title. The court held that the defendants had no legal right to remain on the land and were therefore trespassers. The plaintiff was entitled to a permanent injunction and eviction orders, with the process to be carried out in accordance with the statutory requirements for eviction...

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiff; permanent injunction and eviction orders granted; costs to the plaintiff.

Orders

  • A permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their agents or servants from ploughing, cultivating, entering, trespassing and constructing on the suit land.
  • The defendants to vacate the suit land within 90 days from the date of judgment, failing which eviction orders to issue in accordance with section 152 of the Land Act, 2016.