https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/9546

https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/9546

The trial court failed to consider the applicant’s custody period despite the mandatory requirement under section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, so the sentence had to be backdated to the date of arrest.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KEHC 9546 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: ERICK MAVULU AKWEYU; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision E095 of 2026
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Sentence Review After Conviction
Outcome
Application allowed; sentence revised.
Judges
["DR Kavedza"]
Legal Topics
Robbery With Violence, Credit for Time Spent in Custody, Revision of Sentence, Section 333(2) Criminal Procedure Code
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentencing Procedure Robbery With Violence Credit for Time Spent in Custody Revision of Sentence Section 333(2) Criminal Procedure Code

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 10
Sign in to unlock

Parties

ERICK MAVULU AKWEYU

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Sentence Review After Conviction

  1. 1 Whether the trial court failed to factor in the applicant’s time spent in remand custody when sentencing
  2. 2 Whether the sentence should be varied to commence from the date of arrest

Ratio Decidendi

The trial court failed to consider the applicant’s custody period despite the mandatory requirement under section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, so the sentence had to be backdated to the date of arrest.

Court Disposition

Application allowed; sentence revised.

Orders

  • The sentence imposed by the trial court shall run from 17th January 2023, the date of arrest.
  • Orders accordingly.