[2013] KEHC 5941 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate that his appeal had overwhelming chances of success or that there were exceptional or unusual circumstances warranting release on bail pending appeal. The evidence showed that the complainant, a cousin of the applicant, recognized him and the offence was...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] KEHC 5941 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Erick Mumo Kyumu; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Machakos
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 107 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Bail Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- LN Mutende
- Legal Topics
- Bail Pending Appeal, Sexual Offences, Standard of Proof, Exceptional Circumstances
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Erick Mumo Kyumu
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Bail Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to bail pending appeal.
- 2 Whether the appeal has overwhelming chances of success.
- 3 Whether there are exceptional or unusual circumstances justifying release on bail.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate that his appeal had overwhelming chances of success or that there were exceptional or unusual circumstances warranting release on bail pending appeal. The evidence showed that the complainant, a cousin of the applicant, recognized him and the offence was committed in broad daylight, making mistaken identity unlikely. Issues raised regarding admissibility of documents and corroboration were deemed technical and reserved for the substantive appeal. The court emphasized that corroboration is not required in sexual offences and that the applicant's arguments did not meet the threshold for bail pending appeal as established in Dominic...
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application for bail pending appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
No. 56/2013
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 107 OF 2012
ERICK MUMO KYUMU……………………………….APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC …………………………………………….RESPONDENT
(Being an appeal from the original conviction and sentence in Makueni Principal Magistrate’s Court Criminal Case No. 663/2011 by Hon. R. Yator ,RM on 31/7/2012)
RULING
Erick Mumo Kyumu the applicant herein seeks to be released on bail pending appeal. The application is based on grounds that the appeal has an overwhelming chance of success; serving sentences imposed would mean he will suffer and be inconvenienced; no compensation would suffice his incarceration; and there were exceptional and/or unusual circumstances that required him to be released on bail.
In his affidavit in support of the application, he states that he was convicted by Makueni Court in Criminal Case No. 663/2011 whereby he was sentenced to 24 years imprisonment; the trial magistrate violated his rights by passing a hefty sentence; his continued incarceration is a violation of his constitutional rights.
Learned Counsel for the applicant Mr. Mutie relied on his written submissions. He stated that the case against the applicant had not been proved to the required standard therefore there was no justification in depriving the applicant his liberty. He relied on the case ofDominic Karanja versus Republic [1986] KLR 612.
Relying on the case of Ndungu versus Republic [1985] KLR, he argued that the court relied on an undated document which should not have been accepted in evidence. The magistrate relied on hearsay evidence contrary to the law and there was no corroboration of the evidence adduced as stated in the case of Thuo versus Republic [1988] KLR 764.
In a reply thereto learned State Counsel Mr. Mwangi opposed the application relying on the case ofJivraj Shah versus Republic(unreported). He argued that there must be exceptional or unusual circumstances that would enable the court conclude that it is in the interest of justice to grant bail. The court must also take into consideration if a substantial part of sentence has been served before conclusion of the appeal. The court must also consider if the appeal has overwhelming chances of success.
He submitted that the applicant had been recognised by the complainant since the offence was committed at 3. 00 pm and the two (2) were blood cousins. The court found her to be a truthful witness. Her evidence did not have to be corroborated for it was a sexual offence. The age of the child and the injuries sustained in the anus in respect of the second count had been proved.
Further, he argued that the appeal was going to be concluded before a substantial part of the sentence imposed would have been served.
I have considered rival submissions by both counsels.
In the cited case of Dominic Karanja versus Republic [1986] KLR 612,the Court of Appeal held that:-
“The most important issue was that if the appeal had such overwhelming chances of success, there was no justification for depriving the applicant of his liberty and the minor relevant considerations would be whether there were exceptional or unusual circumstances.”
A perusal of proceedings and judgment thereof reveal that the complainant was a cousin to the appellant. She recognised him. The act is said to have been committed at 3. 00pm in broad daylight. She could not have been mistaken as to his identity.
In citing the case of Ndungu versus Republic [1985] KLR487, counsel for the applicant argued that the documents ought not to have been accepted. The issue raised is a technicality which will be addressed at a later stage during the hearing of the substantive appeal as it is only in respect of the second count. The issue of corroboration raised is a matter that will also be addressed during the hearing of the substantive appeal. But, it is important to note that it is not a requirement in sexual offences.
Taking into consideration the evidence adduced, I am not persuaded that the appeal has an overwhelming chance of success. Secondly, there are no unusual circumstances alluded to that would make this court exercise its discretion. The application is therefore dismissed.
DATED, SIGNED andDELIVERED at MACHAKOSthis21ST day of JUNE, 2013.
L.N. MUTENDE
JUDGE