[2017] KEHC 4391 (KLR)
The court found that the original sentence of 5 years imprisonment was excessive given the circumstances: the offence was committed within a family setting, the value of the stolen maize was relatively low, and the appellant had already served 22 months. The court exercised its discretion to substitute the sentence...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEHC 4391 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Erick Munyelekwa; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Bungoma
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 202 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal_allowed
- Judges
- DO Ohungo
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing Principles, Plea of Guilty, Theft From Dwelling, Family Context Offence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Erick Munyelekwa
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of 5 years imprisonment for entering a dwelling house with intent to commit a felony was harsh in the circumstances.
- 2 Whether the period already served by the appellant constituted adequate punishment.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the original sentence of 5 years imprisonment was excessive given the circumstances: the offence was committed within a family setting, the value of the stolen maize was relatively low, and the appellant had already served 22 months. The court exercised its discretion to substitute the sentence with a term equivalent to the period already served, holding that this duration constituted adequate punishment. The court emphasized proportionality in sentencing and the importance of considering both the value of the property and the familial context of the offence.
Court Disposition
appeal_allowed
Orders
- The sentence of 5 years imprisonment is set aside.
- The sentence is substituted with 22 months imprisonment, already served.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
18 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT BUNGOMA
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 202 OF 2015
(An appeal from the conviction and sentence by F. Kyambia (PM) in Sirisia
CrC No. 1034 of 2015)
ERICK MUNYELEKWA...........................APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC............................................RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
[1]. ERICK MUNYELEKWA (the appellant) was convicted on his own plea of guilty for the offence of entering into a dwelling house with intent to commit a felony C/Sec. 305 (1) of the Penal Code and sentenced to serve 5 years imprisonment.
The particulars of the charge were that on the night of 2nd and 3rd October, 2015 at MULUKHA village in Bungoma West Sub-county, he entered into the dwelling house of SELINA NELIMA WANASWA from where he stole 50Kgs of Maize.
[2]. The complainant was the appellant’s mother and had gone away to SANGALO leaving the appellant and other children in their house. Upon her return on 03/10/2015 she realized that 50Kgs of maize was missing from the store. She made inquiries and learnt that the appellant had sold the maize to a store in SIRISIA town. She was able to trace 32Kgs of the maize which had been sold to one DAVID SITUMA, and the appellant led them to the recovery of another 18Kgs which he had stored. The recovered maize was produced in court as exhibit.
A social inquiry report dated 21/10/2015 presented to the trial court indicated that the appellant was of questionable character for whom stealing and creating disturbance formed a prominent part of his profile. The appellant’s appeal is on the 5 years sentence only and prays for leniency.
[3]. MR. AKELLO on behalf of the State left the issue to the court’s discretion. The value of the maize was not given but I take judicial notice that currently 90Kgs bag of maize sells for about Kshs.2,800/=, so a 50kg bag should be about Kshs.1,200/=. This was an offence committed within the family set up. The appellant has served 22 months of the sentence and taking into account the quantity and value of maize and the circumstances under which the offence was committed it is my view that 5 years imprisonment was rather harsh. He has served one year plus, which in my opinion is adequate punishment. Consequently the 5 years sentence is set aside and is substituted with 22 months imprisonment which he has already served.
He shall be set at liberty forthwith unless otherwise lawfully held.
Deliveredand dated this 14thday of July, 2017 at Bungoma.
H. A. OMONDI
JUDGE