[2025] KEHC 8088 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 8088 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had established that the consolidated certificates of taxation were issued in their favour, the respondent had not challenged or set aside the certificates, and there was no dispute as to the retainer. In the absence of any reference or opposition from the respondent, and pursuant...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEHC 8088 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Erick Ntabo & Company Advocates; Respondent: Trident Insurance Company Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Naivasha
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Case E048 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Unopposed Application for Judgment on Consolidated Certificates of Taxation
Outcome
application allowed; judgment entered for applicant for consolidated taxed costs; interest awarded from date of ruling; costs of application awarded to applicant
Judges
GL Nzioka
Legal Topics
Advocate Client Costs, Taxation of Costs, Enforcement of Certificates, Interest on Costs
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Advocate Client Costs Taxation of Costs Enforcement of Certificates Interest on Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Erick Ntabo & Company Advocates

Applicant

Trident Insurance Company Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Unopposed Application for Judgment on Consolidated Certificates of Taxation

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to judgment for the consolidated sum certified in the certificates of taxation.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent has challenged or set aside the certificates of taxation.
  3. 3 Whether interest on the taxed costs is payable and from what date.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had established that the consolidated certificates of taxation were issued in their favour, the respondent had not challenged or set aside the certificates, and there was no dispute as to the retainer. In the absence of any reference or opposition from the respondent, and pursuant to section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, the court held that the applicant was entitled to judgment for the certified sum. Regarding interest, the court held that since there was no evidence of service of the certificates and non-payment prior to the application, interest would accrue from the date of the ruling until payment in full. The applicant was also awarded the costs of...

Court Disposition

application allowed; judgment entered for applicant for consolidated taxed costs; interest awarded from date of ruling; costs of application awarded to applicant

Orders

  • Judgment is entered in favour of the applicant for the consolidated certificates of taxation in the sum of Kshs 2,133,931.
  • Interest shall accrue on the sum from the date of this ruling until payment in full.