[2025] KEHC 8088 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had established that the consolidated certificates of taxation were issued in their favour, the respondent had not challenged or set aside the certificates, and there was no dispute as to the retainer. In the absence of any reference or opposition from the respondent, and pursuant...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEHC 8088 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Erick Ntabo & Company Advocates; Respondent: Trident Insurance Company Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Naivasha
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Civil Case E048 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Unopposed Application for Judgment on Consolidated Certificates of Taxation
- Outcome
- application allowed; judgment entered for applicant for consolidated taxed costs; interest awarded from date of ruling; costs of application awarded to applicant
- Judges
- GL Nzioka
- Legal Topics
- Advocate Client Costs, Taxation of Costs, Enforcement of Certificates, Interest on Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Erick Ntabo & Company Advocates
Applicant
Trident Insurance Company Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Unopposed Application for Judgment on Consolidated Certificates of Taxation
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to judgment for the consolidated sum certified in the certificates of taxation.
- 2 Whether the respondent has challenged or set aside the certificates of taxation.
- 3 Whether interest on the taxed costs is payable and from what date.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had established that the consolidated certificates of taxation were issued in their favour, the respondent had not challenged or set aside the certificates, and there was no dispute as to the retainer. In the absence of any reference or opposition from the respondent, and pursuant to section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, the court held that the applicant was entitled to judgment for the certified sum. Regarding interest, the court held that since there was no evidence of service of the certificates and non-payment prior to the application, interest would accrue from the date of the ruling until payment in full. The applicant was also awarded the costs of...
Court Disposition
application allowed; judgment entered for applicant for consolidated taxed costs; interest awarded from date of ruling; costs of application awarded to applicant
Orders
- Judgment is entered in favour of the applicant for the consolidated certificates of taxation in the sum of Kshs 2,133,931.
- Interest shall accrue on the sum from the date of this ruling until payment in full.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
Erick Ntabo & Company Advocates v Trident Insurance Company Limited (Miscellaneous Civil Case E048, E050, E051, E052, E053, E055, Eo56, E058, E060, E061, E062, E063, E065, E067, E068, E069, E070, E071, E072, E073, E074, E075, E076, E078, E080 & E081 of 2024 (Consolidated)) [2025] KEHC 8088 (KLR) (5 June 2025) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 8088 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Naivasha
Miscellaneous Civil Case E048, E050, E051, E052, E053, E055, Eo56, E058, E060, E061, E062, E063, E065, E067, E068, E069, E070, E071, E072, E073, E074, E075, E076, E078, E080 & E081 of 2024 (Consolidated)
GL Nzioka, J
June 5, 2025
Between
Erick Ntabo & Company Advocates
Applicant
and
Trident Insurance Company Limited
Respondent
Ruling
1. By a notice of motion application dated 20th February 2025, brought under Order 51 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules, section 51(2) of the Advocates Act (Chapter 16) Laws of Kenya and all other enabling provisions of the law the applicant is seeking for the following orders: -a.That this Honourable court be pleased to consolidate this matter with Naivasha High Court Miscellaneous Application numbers E050, E051 ,E052, E053, E055, E056, E058 ,E060, E061, E062, E063, E065, E067, E068, E069, E070 ,E071, E072, E073, E074, E075, E076,E 078, E080 & E081 all of 2024b.That upon prayer (a) above being granted this Honourable Court be pleased to enter judgment in favour of the applicant for the consolidated certificates of taxation in the sum of Kshs 2,133,931c.That upon prayer (b) above being granted this honourable court be pleased to issue a decree forthwith.d.That the respondent do pay to the applicant the costs of this application together with interest from the date of ruling.
2. The application is based on the following grounds; -a.The suit herein and Naivasha High Court Miscellaneous Applications numbers E050, E051, E052, E053, E054, E055, E056, E058, E060, E061, E062, E063, E065, E067, E068, E069, E070, E071, E072, E073, E074, E075, E076, E077, E078, E079,E080 & E081 all of 2024 relate to the same parties and a similar cause of action.b.That the applicant filed his Advocate-Client Bill of Costs in this matter alongside Naivasha High Court Miscellaneous Applications numbers E050, E051, E052, E053, E055, E056, E058, E060, E061, E062, E063, E065, E067, E068, E069, E070, E071, E072, E073, E074, E075, E076 ,E078, E080& E081 all of 2024. c.That the said Bills of costs were taxed at a consolidated amount of Kshs 2,133,931. 00 in favour of the applicant as against the respondent and certificates of taxation issues to that effect.d.That the respondent has neglected, refused and or failed to settle the taxed costs despite being served on 7th October 2024 with various certificate of costs.e.That the taxed bills remain unchallenged as no reference has been filed against them.f.That there is no dispute that the respondent retained the applicant in the consolidated matters as their Advocates, and which gave rise to the Advocate-Client’s Costs taxed hereing.That it is only fair and just in the circumstances that the judgment be entered for a consolidated sum Sic Kenya Shillings Two Million One Hundred and Thirty Three Thousand Nine Hundred Thirty One (Kshs 2,133,931. 00) only and a decree of the court be issued.h.That this application is made in the interest of justice.
3. The application was further supported by the affidavit sworn by Erick Nyarangi Ntabo, an Advocate in the applicant’s firm. The contents thereof mirror the grounds in support of the application.
4. Be that as it were on hearing the application the court on 28th April 2025 ordered the application be served and canvassed orally on 4th June 2025. The respondent was to be served. On 4th June 2025 the court was informed that the respondent had been served but was absent.
5. Pursuant to the aforesaid, the court fixed the matter for judgment deeming the application as unopposed.
6. Having considered the entire matter, I note that, in all the subject files there is evidence of certificates of taxing. In addition in matters Miscellaneous E050, E056, E065, E064, E069, E070, E076, E081, copies of the ruling of the taxing master have been availed
7. Further, the provisions of section 51(2) of Advocates act, provides as follows: -“The certificate of a taxing officer by whom it has been taxed shall, unless it is set aside or altered by the court, be final as to the amount of costs covered thereby, and the court may make such order in relation thereto as it thinks fit, including in a case where the retainer is not disputed, an order that judgment be entered for the sum certified to be due with costs.”
8. Pursuant thereto, it is evident, that there is no dispute on the retainer and neither is there any reference on the decision of the taxing master and/or the same having been set aside. I consequently allow the application in terms of prayer (1) and (2) thereof. The issue of a decree is a process to be undertaken upon entry of judgment and does not require a court order.
9. As regards interest, the same is payable one (1) month from the date when the respondent was notified of the taxed as provided for in Rule 7 of the Advocates Remuneration Order which states:-“An advocate may charge interest at 14 per cent per annum on his disbursements and costs, whether by scale or otherwise, from the expiration of one month from the delivery of his bill to the client, provided that such claim for interest is raised before the amount of the bill shall have been paid or tendered in full.”
10. In the instant matter the applicant has annexed to the application certificates of taxation. There is no evidence that, the same have been served upon the respondent and not paid, as a result interest will accrue from date of this ruling until payment in full. The costs of this application are awarded to the applicant.
11. It is so ordered
Dated, delivered and signed this 5th day of June 2025GRACE L. NZIOKAJUDGEIn the presence ofMs Omolo for applicantN/A for respondentKomen- Court assistantPage | 2