[2016] KEHC 8050 (KLR)
The court found that the consolidated bond terms previously set were reasonable and even lenient, considering the Applicant was facing charges of theft involving substantial sums (Kshs.650,000/- and Kshs.500,000/-). The Applicant's personal circumstances and claims of frustration in the bond approval process did not...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] KEHC 8050 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Erick Otieno Atanga; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application 265 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Reduction of Bond Terms
- Outcome
- application for reduction of bond terms dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Bail and Bond Terms, Criminal Trial Procedure, Judicial Discretion
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Erick Otieno Atanga
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Reduction of Bond Terms
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the bond terms imposed on the Applicant are excessive and should be reduced.
- 2 Whether the trial court's process for approval of surety documents was improperly frustrated.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the consolidated bond terms previously set were reasonable and even lenient, considering the Applicant was facing charges of theft involving substantial sums (Kshs.650,000/- and Kshs.500,000/-). The Applicant's personal circumstances and claims of frustration in the bond approval process did not warrant a reduction in bond terms. The court declined to vary the bond terms, but directed the trial magistrate or executive officer to provide an explanation for the delay in approval of the surety, ensuring procedural fairness in the bond approval process.
Court Disposition
application for reduction of bond terms dismissed
Orders
- The request for reduction of bond is dismissed.
- The trial magistrate or executive officer in Criminal Case No.670 of 2015 is directed to write to this court by 23rd September 2016 explaining the delay in approval of the bond.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
17 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OKENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
CRIMINAL DIVISION
MISC. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 265 0F 2016
ERICK OTIENO ATANGA…………………………………….APPLICANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC……………………………………………………RESPONDENT
RULING
The Applicant herein is currently facing two criminal trials before the Chief Magistrate’s Court at Milimani. He had previously approached this court in Criminal Application No.127 of 2016 in which he requested for a consolidation of the bond terms in the two criminal files. The request was granted and the court ordered for his release on a cash bail of Kshs.200,000/- or a bond of Kshs.500,000/- with one surety of a similar amount. The surety was to be assessed by the trial magistrate in Criminal Case No.670 of 2015. The other trial is confined to Criminal Case No.1099 of 2015. In this application, he is requesting for reduction of bond terms claiming that the same were too high and unaffordable. Furthermore, the trial court’s process of bond approval had been frustrated by the investigating officer who failed to approve the surety documents. In addition, he informed the court that he was married with six children all of whom depend on him. He also stated that he suffered from ulcers and the diet in the Prison was not conducive for the sickness.
It is trite that bond terms must always be commensurate with the charges an accused person is facing. In so consolidating the bond terms, the court considered this factor. In Criminal Case No.1099 of 2015, the Applicant faces a charge of theft of Kshs.650,000/- the property of First Community Bank of Kenya. In Criminal Case No.670 of 2015, he is charged with theft of Kshs.500,000/- the property of Rafiki Micro-Finance Bank. A look at those charges definitely demonstrates that the bond terms as consolidated are not only reasonable but lenient. In the circumstances, this court is disinclined to vary them.
As regard the frustration on approval of the bond terms, the submission by the Applicant is solely against no other view. As such, I would be hesitant to direct that the Deputy Registrar of this court assesses the surety before a letter is written by the trial magistrate or the executive officer of the Magistrate’s Court in Criminal Case No.670 of 2015 on why the surety has not been approved this far. In the end, I direct that the said Learned Magistrate/Executive Officer in that case writes to this court no later than 23rd of September 2016 explaining the delay in the approval of the bond of the Applicant. The matter will be mentioned on 27th of September 2016 for this purpose. In the meantime, the request for reduction of bond is dismissed.
DATED AND DELIVERED ON 14TH SEPTEMBER 2016
G.W. NGENYE-MACHARIA
JUDGE
In the presence of;
1. Applicant present in person
2. M/s Atina for the Respondent