[2017] KEHC 1192 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 1192 (KLR)

The court, upon reviewing the age assessment report prepared by Dr. Oyieke M.A., found that the appellant was 18 years old, thus of majority age. This finding confirmed that the appellant was not a minor at the time of conviction and sentencing. Consequently, there was no basis to disturb the conviction or sentence...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEHC 1192 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Erick Wanyonyi Simiyu; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kitale
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Appeal 78 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Further Orders After Judgment and Age Assessment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Judges
HK Chemitei
Legal Topics
Sexual Offences, Age Assessment, Sentencing, Criminal Appeals
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sexual Offences Age Assessment Sentencing Criminal Appeals

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Erick Wanyonyi Simiyu

Appellant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Further Orders After Judgment and Age Assessment

  1. 1 Whether the appellant was a minor or of majority age at the time of conviction and sentencing.
  2. 2 Whether the appeal should be allowed or dismissed in light of the age assessment report.

Ratio Decidendi

The court, upon reviewing the age assessment report prepared by Dr. Oyieke M.A., found that the appellant was 18 years old, thus of majority age. This finding confirmed that the appellant was not a minor at the time of conviction and sentencing. Consequently, there was no basis to disturb the conviction or sentence as previously determined in the judgment dated 21/9/2017. The appeal was therefore dismissed, and the orders of the lower court were upheld.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed as per the judgment dated 21/9/2017.