[2004] KEHC 2352 (KLR)

[2004] KEHC 2352 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant's request to pay the decretal amount by monthly installments of KES 100,000 was unreasonable, especially in light of the prior consent agreement between the parties to pay KES 300,000 per month. The applicant had not made any payments since judgment was entered, and there was no...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2004] KEHC 2352 (KLR)
Parties
Respondent: Ernest Imboba; Applicant: Lake Basin Development Authority
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisii
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Judgment Date
15 June 2004
Case Number
? 394 of 1994
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Application for Payment of Decretal Sum by Installments
Outcome
application dismissed; prior consent on payment terms enforced
Legal Topics
Execution of Judgments, Payment by Installments
Source Language
english
Civil Procedure Execution of Judgments Payment by Installments

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ernest Imboba

Respondent

Lake Basin Development Authority

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Ruling on Application for Payment of Decretal Sum by Installments

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be allowed to settle the decretal amount by monthly installments of KES 100,000 instead of the previously agreed KES 300,000.
  2. 2 Whether the court should enforce the consent agreement entered by the parties regarding the mode of payment of the decretal sum.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant's request to pay the decretal amount by monthly installments of KES 100,000 was unreasonable, especially in light of the prior consent agreement between the parties to pay KES 300,000 per month. The applicant had not made any payments since judgment was entered, and there was no sufficient justification to depart from the consent. The court therefore rejected the application and ordered that the decretal amount be settled as previously agreed, by monthly installments of KES 300,000, failing which execution would issue.

Court Disposition

application dismissed; prior consent on payment terms enforced

Orders

  • The applicant's prayer to pay the decretal amount by installments of KES 100,000 per month is rejected.
  • The applicant is ordered to settle the decretal amount by monthly installments of KES 300,000 per month with effect from 30th June 2004 as earlier agreed.