[2007] KEHC 2314 (KLR)
The court found that the suit was last in court on 14th June 2006 and adjourned generally. No action was taken by the plaintiff to fix the case for hearing for almost 11 months, far exceeding the three-month period provided under Order 16 rule 5(d) of the Civil Procedure Rules. The defendant exercised his right to...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2007] KEHC 2314 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Ernest Kemboi; Defendant: Reuben Kiprotich Chebutich
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Eldoret
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 44 of 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Ruling on Application for Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
- Outcome
- suit dismissed for want of prosecution with costs to the defendant
- Judges
- K Bauni
- Legal Topics
- Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Case Management, Adjournment, Failure to Prosecute
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ernest Kemboi
Plaintiff
Reuben Kiprotich Chebutich
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Application for Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the suit should be dismissed for want of prosecution under Order 16 rule 5 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the suit was last in court on 14th June 2006 and adjourned generally. No action was taken by the plaintiff to fix the case for hearing for almost 11 months, far exceeding the three-month period provided under Order 16 rule 5(d) of the Civil Procedure Rules. The defendant exercised his right to apply for dismissal. The plaintiff did not file any affidavit or grounds of opposition to explain the delay or show interest in prosecuting the suit. The court concluded that the plaintiff was no longer interested in pursuing the matter and allowed the application, dismissing the suit with costs.
Court Disposition
suit dismissed for want of prosecution with costs to the defendant
Orders
- The suit is dismissed for want of prosecution.
- The plaintiff shall pay the costs of the suit to the defendant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT ELDORET Civil Case 44 of 2004 (OS)
ERNEST KEMBOI…………………………………………..…PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
REUBEN KIPROTICH CHEBUTICH…………………….DEFENDANT
R U L I N G
The applicant/Defendant seeks the court to dismiss the suit for want of prosecution.
The Respondent did not file any grounds of opposition or a replying affidavit. The application was therefore heard ex-parte. In the grounds in support of the application and the affidavit by SIMON SHIVAJI counsel for the applicant it is stated that the matter was last in court on 14th June 2004. Since then the respondent/plaintiff has not taken any steps to prosecute it.
Order 16 rule 5 CPR provides as follows:-
“If within three months after
a) ……………………………..
b) ……………………………..
c) ……………………………..
d) The adjournment of the suit generally, the plaintiffs or the court on its own motion on notice to be parties, does not set the suit for hearing, the defendant may set the suit down for hearing or apply for its dismissal.”
Record shows that the suit was last in court on 14th June 2006 when it was adjourned generally. Since then no action has been taken by the plaintiff to fix the case for hearing. This application was filed on 10th May 2007 which was almost 11 months after the matter was last in court. Three months provided for in order 16 rule 5(d) CPC had clearly lapsed and no action taken. The defendant had the option of setting the suit for hearing or applying for its dismissal. He chose the matter which was within his rights. The application was served on the defendants but they have not filed any affidavit to explain why no action has been taken. The court therefore take it that he is no longer interested in prosecuting the suit.
In the circumstances I allow the application and dismiss the suit with costs.
Dated and Delivered at Eldoret on 6th July,2007.
KABURU BAUNI
JUDGE
DELIVERED IN THE PRESENCE OF:-
C/C - David
Mr. Songa for Shivaji for Applicant
N/A for Respondent.