[2006] KEHC 1991 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant, who claims adverse possession and is in possession of the suit land, established sufficient grounds for the preservation of the property pending the hearing and determination of the suit. The respondent did not oppose the application. The court held that it is in the interest of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2006] KEHC 1991 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Ernest Odhiambo; Respondent: Peter Gabriel Onyango
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kakamega
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Suit 18 of 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit / Interlocutory Application for Injunction
- Outcome
- Application allowed. Injunction and inhibition order granted.
- Legal Topics
- Interlocutory Injunctions, Adverse Possession, Preservation of Property, Land Title Disputes
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ernest Odhiambo
Applicant
Peter Gabriel Onyango
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Interlocutory Application for Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to an interlocutory injunction restraining the respondent from dealing with the suit land pending determination of the suit.
- 2 Whether the conditions for grant of an injunction have been met under Order XXXIX of the Civil Procedure Rules.
- 3 Whether an inhibition order should issue to preserve the suit property.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant, who claims adverse possession and is in possession of the suit land, established sufficient grounds for the preservation of the property pending the hearing and determination of the suit. The respondent did not oppose the application. The court held that it is in the interest of justice to grant an interlocutory injunction restraining the respondent from dealing with the suit land and, suo moto, issued an inhibition order to prevent any registration of dealings with the land until the suit is determined or further orders are made. The orders were made to ensure the subject matter of the litigation is preserved and the ends of justice are met.
Court Disposition
Application allowed. Injunction and inhibition order granted.
Orders
- An interlocutory injunction is granted restraining the respondent from selling, disposing, charging, alienating, or otherwise dealing with land title No. Bunyala/Mudembi/1735 pending determination of the suit.
- An inhibition order shall issue forthwith inhibiting registration of any dealing with land title No. Bunyala/Mudembi/1735 until the suit is determined or until further order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
15 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT KAKAMEGA
Civil Suit 18 of 2006
ERNEST ODHIAMBO ..................................................................PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT
V E R S U S
PETER GABRIEL ONYANGO ...........................................DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT
R U L I N G
The Plaintiff made on 24. 2.06 an application by Chamber Summons premised on Order XXXIX Rules 1, 2, and 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules and section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act, Cap.21 of the Laws of Kenya seeking an injunction to restrain the Defendant from selling or disposing, charging, alienating or in any other manner dealing with the subject matter of the suit, to wit, land title No. Bunyala/Mudembi/1735 pending the hearing of and the determination of the suit herein. The application was supported by the Applicant’s affidavit sworn on 24. 2.2006 and the grounds on which it was made were stated in the body of the said application which included the need to preserve the suit property pending the hearing and determination of the suit.
The application was not opposed by the Respondent who was served on 25-2-2006 but filed neither a replying affidavit nor grounds of opposition.
Mr. Gitau Kariuki, learned counsel for the Applicant, urged me to allow the application and grant the orders sought in the interest of justice as the conditions for the grant of injunction were met. He pointed out that the applicant was in possession of the suit land and that his claim was for the title to the suit land. The originating summons herein shows that the Applicant claims to have become entitled under section 38 of the Limitation of Actions Act, Cap. 22, to be registered as the proprietor of the suit land on the basis of the doctrine of adverse possession. The Applicant avers that he is fearful that the Respondent might alienate the land.
I have perused the application and considered the submissions made on behalf of the applicant by his counsel. I think it is in the interest of justice that the suit property be preserved pending the hearing and determination of the suit herein. Accordingly, I allow the application and grant injunction in terms of prayer 3 of the application. So that the ends of justice are met, I order, suo moto, pursuant to section 63 (e) of the Civil Procedure Act, Cap 21 that an inhibition order shall issue forthwith inhibiting until the suit is determined the registration of any dealing with the suit land, to wit, land title No. Bunyala/Mudembi/1735 or until further order or orders. A copy of the inhibition order shall be served on the Land Registrar of Busia District Land Registry who shall register it in the appropriate register, immediately. The costs of the application shall be costs in the cause.
Delivered, dated and signed at Kakamega this 18th day of May 2006
G. B. M. KARIUKI
J U D G E