[2022] KEELC 336 (KLR)

[2022] KEELC 336 (KLR)

The court found that the preliminary objection raised by the defendant required the court to delve into disputed facts, specifically regarding the automatic renewal of the lease and compensation for developments under the tenancy agreement. Since the determination of the objection would necessitate examination of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEELC 336 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Ernest Wanjohi Maina (as the legal representative of Eliud Wanjohi Maina – Deceased); Defendant: Albert Gachore Mwangi
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case E032 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Objection / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome
preliminary objection dismissed
Legal Topics
Controlled Tenancy, Jurisdiction of Court, Business Premises Rent Tribunal, Lease Renewal Disputes
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Controlled Tenancy Jurisdiction of Court Business Premises Rent Tribunal Lease Renewal Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ernest Wanjohi Maina (as the legal representative of Eliud Wanjohi Maina – Deceased)

Plaintiff

Albert Gachore Mwangi

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Preliminary Objection / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

  1. 1 Whether the court has jurisdiction to hear the suit before exhaustion of remedies under the Landlord & Tenants (Shops, Hotels and Catering Establishment) Act Cap 301.
  2. 2 Whether the preliminary objection raised constitutes a pure point of law.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the preliminary objection raised by the defendant required the court to delve into disputed facts, specifically regarding the automatic renewal of the lease and compensation for developments under the tenancy agreement. Since the determination of the objection would necessitate examination of evidence and facts, it did not meet the threshold of a pure point of law as required for a preliminary objection. Consequently, the court dismissed the preliminary objection and allowed the defendant additional time to file a defence.

Court Disposition

preliminary objection dismissed

Orders

  • The preliminary objection is dismissed with costs.
  • The defendant is granted more days to file a defence.