[2015] KEELRC 1594 (KLR)
The court found that the respondent failed to provide proper justification or evidence to warrant the order for security for costs. The application was dismissed as the threshold for granting such an order had not been met. The court emphasized that security for costs is not granted as a matter of course but...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] KEELRC 1594 (KLR)
- Parties
- Claimant: Erwan Lanoe; Respondent: Five Forty Aviation Limited
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 2157 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Cause / Interlocutory Application Ruling
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Security for Costs, Interlocutory Applications, Costs Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Erwan Lanoe
Claimant
Five Forty Aviation Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Interlocutory Application Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent has established sufficient justification for an order requiring the claimant to deposit security for costs.
- 2 Whether the application for security for costs should be granted pending the hearing of the defence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondent failed to provide proper justification or evidence to warrant the order for security for costs. The application was dismissed as the threshold for granting such an order had not been met. The court emphasized that security for costs is not granted as a matter of course but requires clear demonstration of necessity, which was lacking in this case.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application to deposit security for costs at Ksh.30 million is dismissed.
- Costs in the cause.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
16 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS
COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
CAUSE NO. 2157 OF 2014
ERWAN LANOE …………………..………….………CLAIMANT
VERSUS
FIVE FORTY AVIATION LIMITED.…….…...……RESPONDENT
RULING
1. No proper justification has been laid out to warrant the orders sought in the Application dated 26th March, 2015.
2. The hearing of the main suit is under way and the Claimant has closed his case.
3. Defence hearing is set for 18th May, 2015
4. The Application to deposit security for costs at Ksh.30 Million is dismissed.
5. Costs in the cause.
Dated and Delivered at Nairobi this 30th day of April, 2015.
MATHEWS N. NDUMA
PRINCIPAL JUDGE