[2016] KEHC 5299 (KLR)
The court found that the plaintiffs had established a prima facie case as absolute proprietors of the suit land, supported by title deeds. The defendants, having been served, failed to oppose the application, and some expressly disclaimed any interest in the land. The plaintiffs demonstrated ongoing trespass,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] KEHC 5299 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Esinas Olesha Esere; Plaintiff: Evans Vuhasho Esere; Defendant: Joram Sambasi; Defendant: Jairus Alakonya; Defendant: Dickson Ombanya; Defendant: Fred Barasa Khwatenge; Defendant: Abraham Wekesa; Defendant: Boaz Mutinyi; Defendant: Soita Baraza; Defendant: Philip Makokha Sirengo; Defendant: Daniel Asira; Defendant: Peter Ford; Defendant: Jacob Ford; Defendant: Wafula Makokha; Defendant: Erustus Wanjala; Defendant: Kevin Barasa; Defendant: Tito Barasa; Defendant: George Matene; Defendant: Kennedy Masinde; Defendant: Neddy Nanyama Sirengo; Defendant: Rose Naswa; Defendant: Babie Barasa; Defendant: Mrs Mukonambi; Defendant: Josphine Barasa; Defendant: Sarah Khaeli Sirengo
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kakamega
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Land Case 150 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Land and Environment Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction
- Outcome
- Application allowed; interlocutory injunction granted pending hearing of the suit.
- Legal Topics
- Injunctive Relief, Trespass, Ownership Disputes, Quiet Enjoyment, Interlocutory Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Esinas Olesha Esere
Plaintiff
Evans Vuhasho Esere
Plaintiff
Joram Sambasi
Defendant
Jairus Alakonya
Defendant
Dickson Ombanya
Defendant
Fred Barasa Khwatenge
Defendant
Abraham Wekesa
Defendant
Boaz Mutinyi
Defendant
Soita Baraza
Defendant
Philip Makokha Sirengo
Defendant
Daniel Asira
Defendant
Peter Ford
Defendant
Jacob Ford
Defendant
Wafula Makokha
Defendant
Erustus Wanjala
Defendant
Kevin Barasa
Defendant
Tito Barasa
Defendant
George Matene
Defendant
Kennedy Masinde
Defendant
Neddy Nanyama Sirengo
Defendant
Rose Naswa
Defendant
Babie Barasa
Defendant
Mrs Mukonambi
Defendant
Josphine Barasa
Defendant
Sarah Khaeli Sirengo
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Land and Environment Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with their quiet enjoyment and possession of the suit land.
- 2 Whether the plaintiffs have established a prima facie case for the grant of an interlocutory injunction.
- 3 Whether the defendants unlawfully trespassed, occupied, and interfered with the plaintiffs' property rights.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiffs had established a prima facie case as absolute proprietors of the suit land, supported by title deeds. The defendants, having been served, failed to oppose the application, and some expressly disclaimed any interest in the land. The plaintiffs demonstrated ongoing trespass, destruction, and deprivation of their property rights, amounting to irreparable harm. The court was satisfied that the requirements for granting an interlocutory injunction were met, and thus allowed the application in terms of prayer 2, restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiffs' quiet enjoyment and possession of the suit land pending the hearing of the suit.
Court Disposition
Application allowed; interlocutory injunction granted pending hearing of the suit.
Orders
- A permanent injunction is issued restraining the defendants, their agents, servants, employees, or representatives from trespassing into, entering, wasting, digging, cultivating, grazing, clearing, excavating, fencing, erecting any structure, or interfering with the plaintiffs' quiet enjoyment and possession of the...
- The order is to be enforced by the officer commanding Malinda Police Station and/or the Assistant County Commissioner of Likuyani county.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
45 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT KAKAMEGA
LAND AND ENVIRONMENT CASE NO. 150 OF 2015
ESINAS OLESHA ESERE...........................................................1ST PLAINTIFF
EVANS VUHASHO ESERE........................................................2ND PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
JORAM SAMBASI....................................................................1ST DEFENDANT
JAIRUS ALAKONYA.................................................................2ND DEFENDANT
DICKSON OMBANYA...............................................................3RD DEFENDANT
FRED BARASA KHWATENGE................................................4TH DEFENDANT
ABRAHAM WEKESA..............................................................5TH DEFENDANT
BOAZ MUTINYI.........................................................................6TH DEFENDANT
SOITA BARAZA.........................................................................7TH DEFENDANT
PHILIP MAKOKHA SIRENGO(son of Neddy Sirengo).......8TH DEFENDANT
DANIEL ASIRA...........................................................................9TH DEFENDANT
PETER FORD............................................................................10TH DEFENDANT
JACOB FORD...........................................................................11TH DEFENDANT
WAFULA MAKOKHA(SON OF ROSE NASWA)...................12th DEFENDANT
ERUSTUS WANJALA..............................................................13TH DEFENDANT
KEVIN BARASA(son of Fred Barasa Khwatenge)...........14TH DEFENDANT
TITO BARASA(nephew to Fred Barasa Khwatenge)......15TH DEFENDANT
GEORGE MATENE.....................................................................16TH DEFENDANT
KENNEDY MASINDE..................................................................17TH DEFENDANT
NEDDY NANYAMA SIRENGO(wife to Benjamin Sirengo)..18TH DEFENDANT
ROSE NASWA(WIFE TO MAURICE MAKOKHA)...................19TH DEFENDANT
BABIE BARASA(WIFE TO AGGREY BARASA)......................20TH DEFENDANT
MRS MUKONAMBI....................................................................21ST DEFENDANT
JOSPHINE BARASA.................................................................22ND DEFENDANT
SARAH KHAELI SIRENGO.........................................................23RD DEFENDANT
RULING
[1] The applicant brings this application under Order 40 Rule 1,3 and 4 and Order 51 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules 2010 and Section 1A, AB 3A and 63 ( c ) and ( e ) of the Civil Procedure Act Cap 21 Laws of Kenya.
He prays for a permanent injunction to issue restraining the defendants either by themselves or through their agents, servants, employees and/or representatives or any other person or group from trespassing into, entering into, wasting, digging or cultivating or grazing on, clearing, excavating, fencing erecting any structure and from interfering with the plaintiffs quiet enjoyment and possession of the suit land pending the hearing of this application and that the order be enforced by the officer commanding Malinda Police Station and/or the Assistant County Commissioner of Likuyani county.
[2] The applicant swore that he is the absolute proprietor of land titles Kakamega/Nzoia/304, 10/114 and 305 and has been issued with title deeds in proof of ownership thereof. He avers that the defendant/respondents unlawfully, arbitrary and/or without any legal justification trespassed into and/or invaded into the suit land, demolished and burnt the plaintiffs houses, vandalized and stole plaintiffs properties, harassed, threatened and illegally evicted the plaintiffs and their families from the suit land and thereafter unlawfully occupied and took possession of the suit land.
[3] The applicant states that currently the defendants have taken possession of the land and are illegally grazing on it, cultivating on it excavating on it, felling down trees and selling timber firewood burning charcoal, and destroying the fence. That they have continued to do so with impunity, arbitrarily, unlawfully and/or without any legal justification thereby gravely violating the plaintiffs’ quiet enjoyment and peaceful possession of the suit land.
The applicant avers that by the plaintiffs’ invasion, they have lost their home and are completely denied user of their land. They aver that this is a fundamental breach to their constitutional right to protection of private property envisaged in article 40 of the Constitution of Kenya 2010.
[4] During the hearing there was no appearance by Rioba Omoto and Co. for 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th,14th, 17th and 20th respondent. The said advocate was duly served, Mr. Watanga advocate appeared for 9th, 18th and 23rd defendants. Mbuluma & Co. for 3rd defendant did not attend the court they were also served. There was no appearance for Chepseba & Co. Advocates who were on record for 2nd, 9th, 10th, 11th, 12th, 13th, 19th and 20th respondents. They were also served. Mr. Watanga for 8th, 18th and 23rd defendant respondent said that his clients had nothing to do with the plaintiffs land Kakamega/Nzoia/304 and 114 since they have their own settlement lands in Scheme No. 137 And for those reasons he said he does not oppose the application. Mr. Makhanu told the court that his application was not opposed. It had been duly served and that there was a return of service. He relied on Machakos ELC No. 235 of 2014 and the Court of Appeal Civil Appeal No. 121 of 2005.
This notice of motion is not opposed. I allow it in terms of prayer 2 pending the hearing of the suit interpartes with costs to the applicant.
Dated at Bungoma this 11th day of May 2016.
S.MUKUNYA - JUDGE
Ruling read in open court in presence of
Mr. Musumba for Makhanu for applicant
Mr. Watanga for Mr. Makhanu for the respondent
S.MUKUNYA - JUDGE
11/5/2016