[2018] KEELC 956 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 956 (KLR)

The court exercised its discretion to set aside the orders made on 2nd May, 2018, finding that the withdrawal of the petition was based on the advocate's view that the issues could be litigated as an ordinary suit. However, in the interest of justice and access to justice, the court determined that the petition...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 956 (KLR)
Parties
Petitioner: Esther Chesang’ Bargochut; Respondent: Kurgat Arap Birir & 13 Others
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Narok
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 7 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Consent Order and Reinstate Petition
Outcome
Application allowed; proceedings and consent order of 2nd May, 2018 set aside; petition reinstated for hearing.
Judges
MN Kullow
Legal Topics
Setting Aside Consent Orders, Reinstatement of Petition, Withdrawal of Petition
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Setting Aside Consent Orders Reinstatement of Petition Withdrawal of Petition

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Esther Chesang’ Bargochut

Petitioner

Kurgat Arap Birir & 13 Others

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Consent Order and Reinstate Petition

  1. 1 Whether the proceedings of 2nd May, 2018 and the consent order should be set aside.
  2. 2 Whether the petition should be reinstated for hearing.

Ratio Decidendi

The court exercised its discretion to set aside the orders made on 2nd May, 2018, finding that the withdrawal of the petition was based on the advocate's view that the issues could be litigated as an ordinary suit. However, in the interest of justice and access to justice, the court determined that the petition should be reinstated and heard on its merits. The overriding objective to facilitate just, expeditious, proportionate, and affordable resolution of disputes guided the court's decision to allow the application and reinstitute the petition.

Court Disposition

Application allowed; proceedings and consent order of 2nd May, 2018 set aside; petition reinstated for hearing.

Orders

  • The orders made by the court on 2nd May, 2018 are set aside.
  • The Petitioner’s Petition is reinstated.