[2021] KEHC 8816 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 8816 (KLR)

The High Court found that the application for contempt was improperly before it because the alleged disobedience concerned an order issued by the Magistrate's Court in a matter that was still active in that court. Section 6 of the Civil Procedure Act prohibits the High Court from proceeding with a matter that is...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 8816 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Esther Gatete; Respondent: Bashiri Kipimo; Respondent: Anthony Kiberu; Respondent: Bashy African Credit Ltd; Respondent: Brian Elly Opar t/a Skypack Consult Auctioneers
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Miscellaneous 267 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome
application dismissed with costs
Judges
A Mbogholi-Msagha
Legal Topics
Contempt of Court, Sub Judice Rule, Execution of Orders
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Contempt of Court Sub Judice Rule Execution of Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Esther Gatete

Applicant

Bashiri Kipimo

Respondent

Anthony Kiberu

Respondent

Bashy African Credit Ltd

Respondent

Brian Elly Opar t/a Skypack Consult Auctioneers

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

  1. 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to entertain an application for contempt of an order issued by the Magistrate's Court when the matter is still active in the lower court.
  2. 2 Whether the application before the High Court is sub judice and constitutes an abuse of court process.

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court found that the application for contempt was improperly before it because the alleged disobedience concerned an order issued by the Magistrate's Court in a matter that was still active in that court. Section 6 of the Civil Procedure Act prohibits the High Court from proceeding with a matter that is directly and substantially in issue in a pending suit before a court of competent jurisdiction. Furthermore, Section 10 of the Magistrates Court Act expressly empowers the Magistrate's Court to punish for contempt of its own orders. Therefore, the High Court held that the application was sub judice and an abuse of process, as the proper forum for addressing the alleged contempt...

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The application dated 28th July 2020 is dismissed with costs to the respondents.