[2019] KECPT 29 (KLR)
The tribunal held that the management committee of a cooperative society, as the governing authority under section 28(3) of the Cooperative Societies Act, is responsible for ensuring the society fulfills its legal obligations, including payment of decretal amounts. The officials named in the notice to show cause did...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KECPT 29 (KLR)
- Parties
- Claimant: Esther Heta Njoroge; Respondent: Regency Sacco Society Limited
- Court
- Cooperative Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Tribunal Case 137 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Notice to Show Cause / Ruling on Notice to Show Cause Regarding Execution of Decree
- Outcome
- Objection to notice to show cause dismissed; warrant of arrest to issue against named officials.
- Legal Topics
- Execution of Decrees, Liability of Officials, Cooperative Societies, Civil Jail, Debt Recovery
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Esther Heta Njoroge
Claimant
Regency Sacco Society Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Notice to Show Cause / Ruling on Notice to Show Cause Regarding Execution of Decree
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the officials of the respondent cooperative society can be arrested and committed to civil jail for failure to pay the decretal amount owed to the claimant.
- 2 Whether the respondent's financial constraints or third-party failures excuse non-payment of the decretal sum.
- 3 Whether the management committee is personally liable for the society's debts under the Cooperative Societies Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal held that the management committee of a cooperative society, as the governing authority under section 28(3) of the Cooperative Societies Act, is responsible for ensuring the society fulfills its legal obligations, including payment of decretal amounts. The officials named in the notice to show cause did not demonstrate inability to pay nor did they file an affidavit of means. The respondent's financial constraints and third-party defaults do not absolve it of liability to the claimant. The tribunal found that the objections raised by the respondent lacked merit and that the officials could be arrested and committed to civil jail for the society's debt, as this is within the...
Court Disposition
Objection to notice to show cause dismissed; warrant of arrest to issue against named officials.
Orders
- Objection/opposition to the notice to show cause dated 19.6.2019 is dismissed with costs.
- Warrant of arrest to issue against Joseph Kibangendi, Mary Ondieki, Sammy Sambu, and Clement Onyango.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE CO-OPERATIVE TRIBUNAL AT NAIROBI
TRIBUNAL CASE NO. 137 OF 2018
ESTHER HETA NJOROGE...........................................................CLAIMANT
VERSUS
REGENCY SACCO SOCIETY LIMITED...............................RESPONDENT
RULING
Matter for determination is a notice to show cause dated 1. 7.2019 seeking for the respondent to show cause why JOSEPH KIBANGENDI,MARY ONDIEKI, SAMMY SAMBU and CLEMENT ONYANGO should not be arrested and committed to civil jail for failing to pay the decretal amount of Kshs.137,345/= The same was opposed vide a replying affidavit of JOSEPH KIBANGENDI, the vice chair of the respondent indicating that there was no declaration that the said mentioned persons are personally liable to pay the judgment amount which is against the Cooperative Society as a distinct separate legal entity.
That the said officials have not in any way delayed or frustrated the execution of the decree issued.
That the respondent is facing financial constraints due to failure by RAYCO REYENT HOTEL LTD to remit members contributions to the respondent as demonstrated in CTC 431 of 2016 REGENCY COOPERATIVE SAVINGS &CREDIT VERSUS CO-OP HOLDINGS COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED AND 6 OTHERS.
That the respondent is willing and ready to satisfy the decretal sum if the remittances from the employer of the members is received.
We have carefully considered the application and the replying affidavit. We note that this suit was filed on 19. 4.18 for refund of share contributions to the claimants amounting to 115,000/=. Judgment was entered on 24. 1.2019.
The respondent filed an application dated 2. 4.19 seeking to set aside the stay of execution; the application was dismissed with costs on 6. 6.2019 paving way for execution proceedings.
Section 28 (3) of Cooperative Societies Act, is clear on the duties of the management committee in the governing authority of the society hence they are mandated to direct the affairs of the society with powers to 3 (b) to institute and defend suits and other legal proceedings brought in the name of or against the society, and 3( c) do all other things necessary to achieve the society’s objectives.
In the circumstances therefore, the Management Committee as per section 28 of Co-operative Society Act are the governing body and SHALLinstitute and defend suits and other legal proceedings brought in the name of or against the Co-operative Society. It therefore goes without saying that they are capable of being arrested and committed to civil jail for the debts of the society.
In the circumstances thereof, the said JOSEPH KIBANGENDI, MARY ONDIEKI, SAMMY SAMBU and CLEMENT ONYANGO being the officials of the respondent must ensure that they do all other things necessary to achieve the objectives of the Cooperative Society in accordance with its by Laws, payment of decretal amounts being one of the duties/obligation enumerated under section 28 (3). We therefore, find that the Replying Affidavit does not properly reflect this position. On the issue of CTC 431 OF 2016 we note that the judgment is not binding in this matter. The claimant gave his contributions to the Respondent hence the Respondent is obligated to satisfy the decretal amount in full without any conditions unless otherwise ordered.
The Respondent has not filed any affidavit of means to show inability or lack of ability to settle the decretal amount. The claimant is entitled to the fruits of the judgment issued on 24. 1.19. In the circumstances we fInd that the objections /oppositions of the notice to show cause dated 19. 6.2019 has no merits and we accordingly dismiss the same with costs.
Consequently, warrant of arrest to issue against JOSEPHKIBANGENDI, MARY ONDIEKI, SAMMY SAMBU and CLEMENT ONYANGO
Read and delivered in open court, this 7th November,2019.
In the presence of:
Claimant:
Respondent:Miss Muthuri holding brief for Nyarango for the Respondent.
Court Assistant:Leweri and Buluma.
B.Kimemia - Chairman-signed.
R.Mwambura – Member-signed.
P.Swanya - Member-signed.