[2022] KEELC 755 (KLR)

[2022] KEELC 755 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had provided a reasonable explanation for the delay in filing the appeal, as the failure was attributable to her former advocates and not to her own inaction. The respondents did not oppose the application, and the applicant demonstrated that she had an arguable appeal. In the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEELC 755 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Esther Michuki Kaumburu; Respondent: Nancy Nkuene Muthuia; Respondent: Martin Lubere
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Isiolo
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application E001 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time and Stay of Execution
Outcome
Application allowed by consent; extension of time, stay of execution, and status quo orders granted.
Legal Topics
Extension of Time to Appeal, Stay of Execution, Status Quo Orders, Advocate Conflict of Interest
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Extension of Time to Appeal Stay of Execution Status Quo Orders Advocate Conflict of Interest

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Esther Michuki Kaumburu

Applicant

Nancy Nkuene Muthuia

Respondent

Martin Lubere

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time and Stay of Execution

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted extension of time to file an appeal against the judgment of the Chief Magistrate in Isiolo ELC No. 17 of 2016.
  2. 2 Whether stay of execution of the judgment/decree should be granted pending the intended appeal.
  3. 3 Whether the status quo in respect to Plot No. 190 Kulamawe, Isiolo should be maintained pending appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had provided a reasonable explanation for the delay in filing the appeal, as the failure was attributable to her former advocates and not to her own inaction. The respondents did not oppose the application, and the applicant demonstrated that she had an arguable appeal. In the interests of justice, and by consent of the parties, the court granted extension of time to file the appeal, stay of execution of the judgment/decree pending the intended appeal, and an order for maintenance of the prevailing status quo in respect to Plot No. 190 Kulamawe, Isiolo. The applicant was directed to file and serve the memorandum and record of appeal within 21 days.

Court Disposition

Application allowed by consent; extension of time, stay of execution, and status quo orders granted.

Orders

  • Extension of time to file appeal against the judgment/decree of the Chief Magistrate in Isiolo ELC No. 17 of 2016 delivered on 27th July, 2021 is granted.
  • Stay of execution of the judgment/decree of the Chief Magistrate in Isiolo ELC No. 17 of 2016 delivered on 27th July, 2021 is granted pending the filing, hearing and determination of the intended appeal.