[2016] KEHC 500 (KLR)
The court adopted the consent of the parties, marking the matter as settled. The applicant had demonstrated a prima facie case for the preservation of the subject land pending investigations into its alleged unlawful alienation. However, since the parties agreed to settle the matter by consent, the court did not...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] KEHC 500 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission; Respondent: Ibrahim Muthoga; Respondent: Godfrey Kamiti; Respondent: Akwaru M' Lintare
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Civil Application 15 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Final Consent Order; Suit Marked as Settled
- Outcome
- suit marked as settled by consent; file closed
- Judges
- FM Njoroge
- Legal Topics
- Public Land Alienation, Injunctive Relief, Anti Corruption Investigations
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission
Applicant
Ibrahim Muthoga
Respondent
Godfrey Kamiti
Respondent
Akwaru M' Lintare
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Final Consent Order; Suit Marked as Settled
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the parcel of land EX-LEWA SETTLEMENT SCHEME/719 was unlawfully alienated from public to private use.
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to an order prohibiting dealings with the land pending investigations.
- 3 Whether the matter should be marked as settled by consent of the parties.
Ratio Decidendi
The court adopted the consent of the parties, marking the matter as settled. The applicant had demonstrated a prima facie case for the preservation of the subject land pending investigations into its alleged unlawful alienation. However, since the parties agreed to settle the matter by consent, the court did not make a substantive determination on the merits of the application. The consent was adopted as an order of the court, and the file was closed with no order as to costs. Any new issues between the parties are to be addressed in a separate suit (Meru ELC No. 285 of 2016).
Court Disposition
suit marked as settled by consent; file closed
Orders
- By consent, Meru E&L Misc. Civil Application No. 15 of 2016 is marked as settled.
- The consent is adopted as an order of the court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
43 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU
MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 15 OF 2016
IN THE MATTER OF:THE ANTI-CORRUPTION AND ECONOMIC CRIMES ACT NO. 3 OF 2003 & THE ETHICS AND ANTI-CORRUPTION COMMISSION ACT, 2011;
AND
IN THE MATTER OF:AN APPLICATION BY THE ETHICS & ANTI-CORRUPTION COMMISSION FOR AN ORDER UNDER SECTION 56 (1) OF ANTI-CORRUPTION AND ECONOMIC CRIMES ACT, NO.3 OF 2003 TO PROHIBIT THE TRANSFER OR DISPOSAL OF OR OTHER DEALINGS WITH THE PARCEL, OF LAND KNOWN AS NO. EX-LEWA SETTLEMENT SCHEME/719 WHICH PROPERTY IS ALLEGED TO BE PUBLIC LAND UNLAWFULLY ALIENATED FOR PRIVATE USE.
BETWEEN
ETHICS AND ANTI-CORRUPTION COMMISSION........................APPLICANT
VERSUS
IBRAHIM MUTHOGA...........................................................1ST RESPONDENT
GODFREY KAMITI...............................................................2ND RESPONDENT
AKWARU M' LINTARE........................................................3RD RESPONDENT
(The 1st, 2nd & 3rd Respondents are sued in their capacity as the officials of Buuri Cattle Dip Self Help Group).
R U L I N G
1. This suit was brought to Court under the Anti corruption and Economic Crimes Act, In its application, the Commission sought orders that:-
(1) This application be certified as urgent and deserving to be heard on priority basis.
(2) This Honourable Court be pleased to prohibit the Respondents by themselves , their agents, servants, associates and any other person with a private interest in the parcel of land known as EX-LEWA SETTLEMENT SCHEME/719 and registered in favour of Buuri Cattle Dip Self Help Group from selling, alienating, transferring, charging, sub-dividing, taking possession, developing or in any similar manner dealing with the said parcel of land (EX-LEWA SETTLEMENT SCHEME/719) for a period of six (6) months.
(3) The costs of this Application be in cause.
2. The application was supported by the affidavit of Leonard Mungai and has the following grounds: -
(1) THAT parcel of land in question, EX-LEWA SETTLEMENT /719, is a public utility which is said to have been fraudulently, corruptly and/or unlawfully alienated to private individuals, Buuri Cattle Dip Self Help Group.
(2) THAT preliminary investigations have revealed that the property was set apart as a public utility, a cattle Dip.
(3) THAT preliminary investigations have further revealed that the respondents and the other members of the Self Help Group mentioned in paragraph (1) above have began the process of sub-dividing the parcel of land herein with a view of effecting private developments thereon.
(4) THAT the applicant, in exercise of its mandate under Section 11 (1) (j) of the Ethics & Anti-corruption Commission Act, 2011, is desirous of conducting further investigations to establish the property of the alienation of the public utility herein individuals and if, need be, recovering it.
(5)THAT the applicant is apprehensive that unless the orders sought are granted the Respondents and the other members of the group the respondents represent may deal or continue dealing with the property in a manner which is prejudicial to the outcome of the intended investigations.
(6) THAT this court has power , under Section 56(1) of Anti-Corruption & Economic Crimes Act, 2003 to grant the orders sought.
(7) THAT no prejudice will be occasioned on the respondents if the orders sought are granted.
(8) THAT it it just and expedient that the orders sought be granted for a period of 6 months to enable investigations into the circumstances leading to alienation of the public utility herein to private individuals.
3. On 23/11/2016, the parties proffered a consent which they asked the Court to adopt as its order
4. The application was in the following terms;
CONSENT
“By Consent Meru E&L Misc. Civil Application No. 15 of 2016 be marked as settled”.
5. The consent is adopted as an order of this Court.
6. New issues concerning the parties will be canvassed in Meru ELC No. 285 of 2016.
7. Matters in this suit are marked settled.
8. The file stands closed.
9. There is no order as to costs.
10. It is so ordered.
DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT AT MERU THIS 23RD DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2016 IN THE PRESENCE OF :-
C A: James
Kyeli for Applicant
Edwin Kimathi for the Respondent
P.M. NJOROGE
JUDGE