[2023] KEELC 17523 (KLR)

[2023] KEELC 17523 (KLR)

The court determined that, due to the similarity of facts, causes of action, and principal defendants in this case and in ELC No 265 of 2018 and ELC No 267 of 2018, it is appropriate to defer the delivery of judgment in the present case until the hearings in the related cases are concluded. This approach will allow...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELC 17523 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Ethics and Anti Corruption Commission; Defendant: William Kimaru; Defendant: Noreen Shariff - Choge Eva Cherogony Byron Kipngetich Gawon Choge (Sued As Administrators Of The Estate Of Jim Choge (Deceased)); Defendant: Wilson Gachanja
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 266 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Scheduling of Judgment
Outcome
Judgment in this case deferred; to be delivered together with judgments in ELC No 265 of 2018 and ELC No 267 of 2018 after conclusion of their hearings.
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Case Consolidation, Judgment Scheduling
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Case Consolidation Judgment Scheduling

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ethics and Anti Corruption Commission

Plaintiff

William Kimaru

Defendant

Noreen Shariff - Choge Eva Cherogony Byron Kipngetich Gawon Choge (Sued As Administrators Of The Estate Of Jim Choge (Deceased))

Defendant

Wilson Gachanja

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Scheduling of Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the judgment in this case should be delivered separately or together with related cases due to similarity of facts and parties.

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that, due to the similarity of facts, causes of action, and principal defendants in this case and in ELC No 265 of 2018 and ELC No 267 of 2018, it is appropriate to defer the delivery of judgment in the present case until the hearings in the related cases are concluded. This approach will allow the judgments to be read together, promoting consistency and judicial efficiency.

Court Disposition

Judgment in this case deferred; to be delivered together with judgments in ELC No 265 of 2018 and ELC No 267 of 2018 after conclusion of their hearings.

Orders

  • Judgment scheduled for today in ELC No 266 of 2018 will not be delivered.
  • Judgment in this case shall await the conclusion of the hearing of ELC No 265 of 2018 and ELC No 267 of 2018 so that they may be read together.