[2024] KEHC 7719 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 7719 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated sufficient grounds for the issuance of a preservation order over the funds held in the 1st respondent's accounts with the 2nd respondent. The funds are alleged to be public monies paid without proof of services rendered, raising suspicion of corrupt conduct. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 7719 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission; Respondent: M/S Papaton Security Services Limited; Respondent: M/S Equity Bank Kenya
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application E266 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Preservation Order
Outcome
interlocutory preservation order granted
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Interlocutory Orders, Asset Preservation, Proceeds of Corruption, Bank Account Freeze, Public Funds, Urgent Applications
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Administrative Law Interlocutory Orders Asset Preservation Proceeds of Corruption Bank Account Freeze Public Funds +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission

Applicant

M/S Papaton Security Services Limited

Respondent

M/S Equity Bank Kenya

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Preservation Order

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has established a prima facie case for the issuance of a preservation order over funds held in the 1st respondent's bank accounts.
  2. 2 Whether the funds in question are suspected proceeds of corrupt conduct or corruption.
  3. 3 Whether the preservation order is necessary to prevent dissipation of public funds pending investigation.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated sufficient grounds for the issuance of a preservation order over the funds held in the 1st respondent's accounts with the 2nd respondent. The funds are alleged to be public monies paid without proof of services rendered, raising suspicion of corrupt conduct. The court held that preservation is necessary to prevent the possible transfer or withdrawal of the funds before investigations are completed, thereby safeguarding public interest and enabling the applicant to fulfill its statutory mandate. The court therefore granted the orders sought, prohibiting the respondents from dealing with the funds for six months, subject to further orders...

Court Disposition

interlocutory preservation order granted

Orders

  • A preservation order is issued prohibiting the 1st and 2nd respondents from transferring, withdrawing, disposing, or in any manner dealing with the money in accounts Nos. 0290297198173 and 0960275676767 in the name of Papaton Security Services Limited at Kisumu and Mbale Branches of Equity Bank Kenya for six months.
  • The applicant shall serve the preservation order upon the 2nd respondent for immediate compliance and thereafter upon the 1st respondent.