[2018] KEHC 906 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 906 (KLR)

The court held that the power to administer an estate is personal to the administrator appointed by the court and cannot be delegated to another person through a power of attorney. The Law of Succession Act provides a specific procedure for substitution of an administrator in cases of incapacity, which must be...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 906 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Eunice Njeri Mwangi; Defendant: Aya Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 126 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Substitution of Plaintiff
Outcome
application dismissed with costs to the respondent
Legal Topics
Substitution of Parties, Powers of Attorney, Administration of Estates, Delegation of Administrative Powers
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Family and Children Substitution of Parties Powers of Attorney Administration of Estates Delegation of Administrative Powers

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Eunice Njeri Mwangi

Plaintiff

Aya Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Substitution of Plaintiff

  1. 1 Whether an administratrix of an estate can delegate her powers to prosecute a suit to attorneys via a power of attorney.
  2. 2 Whether the Law of Succession Act permits substitution of an administrator by way of power of attorney rather than formal substitution under the Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the power to administer an estate is personal to the administrator appointed by the court and cannot be delegated to another person through a power of attorney. The Law of Succession Act provides a specific procedure for substitution of an administrator in cases of incapacity, which must be followed. Allowing substitution by power of attorney would undermine the rights of beneficiaries and could result in the imposition of administrators not chosen by them. The application to substitute the plaintiff with her attorneys was therefore dismissed as lacking merit.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs to the respondent

Orders

  • The application to substitute the plaintiff with her attorneys is dismissed.
  • Costs awarded to the respondent.