[2020] KEELC 3613 (KLR)
The court found that the suit had been struck out and no appeal was pending. The plaintiffs, having lodged a caution on the suit land pending the outcome of the case, had not opposed the application for its removal. The court was satisfied that the application was properly served and that the applicants had...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEELC 3613 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Eunice Wawira Githinji; Plaintiff: Benjamin Kinyua Githinji; Defendant: Patrick Nyamu Kiura; Defendant: Anne Wanjiru Githinji; Defendant: Dorcas Wangechi Githinji; Defendant: Sarah Wambura Githinji; Defendant: Danson Muchiri Kagau; Defendant: Joseph Muchiri Kiburi; Defendant: Purity Njeri Githinji; Defendant: Teresia Watiri Wandiga
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Kerugoya
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 56 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion / Ruling on Application to Withdraw Advocates and Remove Restriction
- Outcome
- application allowed as prayed with costs to the applicants
- Legal Topics
- Removal of Caution, Withdrawal of Advocate, Land Restriction, Finalization of Suit
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Eunice Wawira Githinji
Plaintiff
Benjamin Kinyua Githinji
Plaintiff
Patrick Nyamu Kiura
Defendant
Anne Wanjiru Githinji
Defendant
Dorcas Wangechi Githinji
Defendant
Sarah Wambura Githinji
Defendant
Danson Muchiri Kagau
Defendant
Joseph Muchiri Kiburi
Defendant
Purity Njeri Githinji
Defendant
Teresia Watiri Wandiga
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Ruling on Application to Withdraw Advocates and Remove Restriction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants should be granted leave to withdraw their advocates on record.
- 2 Whether the restriction/caution lodged on land parcel KABARE/MIKARARA/562 should be removed following the conclusion of the suit.
- 3 Whether costs should be awarded to the applicants.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the suit had been struck out and no appeal was pending. The plaintiffs, having lodged a caution on the suit land pending the outcome of the case, had not opposed the application for its removal. The court was satisfied that the application was properly served and that the applicants had demonstrated sufficient grounds for the orders sought. In the absence of any opposition, the court exercised its discretion to allow the application as prayed, including the withdrawal of the advocates on record and the removal of the restriction on the suit property.
Court Disposition
application allowed as prayed with costs to the applicants
Orders
- Leave is granted to the defendants to withdraw the firm of Ikahu Nganga & Co. Advocates as their advocates on record.
- The restriction/caution lodged on land parcel KABARE/MIKARARA/562 is hereby removed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
32 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT
AT KERUGOYA
ELC CASE NO. 56 OF 2015
EUNICE WAWIRA GITHINJI..........................................1ST PLAINTIFF
BENJAMIN KINYUA GITHINJI.....................................2ND PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
PATRICK NYAMU KIURA..........................................1ST DEFENDANT
ANNE WANJIRU GITHINJI........................................2ND DEFENDANT
DORCAS WANGECHI GITHINJI..............................3RD DEFENDANT
SARAH WAMBURA GITHINJI..................................4TH DEFENDANT
DANSON MUCHIRI KAGAU......................................5TH DEFENDANT
JOSEPH MUCHIRI KIBURI......................................6TH DEFENDANT
PURITY NJERI GITHINJI.........................................7TH DEFENDANT
TERESIA WATIRI WANDIGA...................................8TH DEFENDANT
RULING
The application giving rise to this ruling is the Notice of Motion dated 14th August 2019 brought under Section 3A CPA. The Applicants who are also defendants in this case are seeking two orders: first is leave to withdraw the firm of Ikahu Nganga & Co. Advocates who are their advocates on record and secondly, an order to remove a caution and/or restriction lodged on land parcel No. KABARE/MIKARARA/562. The defendants/Applicants are also seeking costs of the application to be provided for. The application is supported by the affidavit of Purity Njeri Githinji sworn the same date. The affidavit is further supported by a certificate of official search dated 5/8/2019. According to the Applicants, this suit which was instituted by the plaintiffs was struck out on 24th May 2018 and no appeal has been preferred by the plaintiffs. The Applicants also contend that the plaintiffs had lodged a caution on the suit land awaiting the outcome of this case. Since the case has now been finalized, they believe that the restriction on the suit land should now be removed. Despite the application having been served, no replying affidavit or grounds of opposition were filed to oppose the same. Order 51 Rule 14 CPR provides three ways in which an application can be opposed as follows:
O. 51 Rule 14 (1) Any Respondent who wishes to oppose any application may file any one or a combination of the following documents:
(a) A notice of Preliminary Objection
(b) Replying affidavit; and/or
(c) A statement of grounds of opposition.
(2) The said documents in sub-rule (1) and a list of authorities, if any shall be filed and served on the applicant not less than three clear days before the date of hearing”.
The provisions of Order 51 Rule 14 (4) gives the Court power to proceed ex-parte where it is satisfied that no response has been filed opposing an application. The Applicants in this application have demonstrated to the satisfaction of this Court that this suit has been concluded after the same was struck out and no appeal has been preferred by the plaintiffs/Respondents. The Court is also satisfied that the Respondents were duly served with the application and that they have elected not to file any response pursuant to Order 51 Rule 14 CPR. The certificate of official search attached to the supporting affidavit sworn by Purity Njeri Githinji dated 5th August 2019 shows that a restriction was placed on the suit property L.R. No. KABARE/MIKARARA/562 vide Ref LND/KIR EXT/16/1/VOL. IX/II -17:9:15.
There being no opposition to the said application, the same is hereby allowed as prayed with costs to the Applicants. It is so ordered.
READ, DELIVERED and SIGNED in open Court at Kerugoya this 24th day of January, 2020.
.............................
E.C. CHERONO
ELC JUDGE
24TH JANUARY, 2020
In the presence of:
(1) 7th Defendant – present
(2) Mbogo – Court clerk