[2010] KEHC 946 (KLR)
The court found that the proceedings in the lower court were prosecuted by an incompetent prosecutor, contrary to the requirements of the Criminal Procedure Code and established case law. This rendered the entire trial a nullity. Additionally, the charge sheet was defective for failing to include the word 'unlawful'...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2010] KEHC 946 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Eustace Ireri; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Embu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 20 of 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; conviction quashed; sentence set aside
- Judges
- J Karanja
- Legal Topics
- Incompetent Prosecution, Defective Charge Sheet, Nullity of Proceedings
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Eustace Ireri
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial was prosecuted by an incompetent prosecutor, rendering the proceedings a nullity.
- 2 Whether the charge sheet was defective for failing to include the word 'unlawful' in the particulars of the charge.
- 3 Whether a retrial should be ordered given the lapse of time since the alleged offence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the proceedings in the lower court were prosecuted by an incompetent prosecutor, contrary to the requirements of the Criminal Procedure Code and established case law. This rendered the entire trial a nullity. Additionally, the charge sheet was defective for failing to include the word 'unlawful' in the particulars of the charge. Given that the state did not seek a retrial and considering the significant lapse of time since the alleged offence, the court determined that a retrial would not be just. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, the conviction quashed, and the sentence set aside.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; conviction quashed; sentence set aside
Orders
- The appeal is allowed.
- The conviction is quashed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
REPUBLICOFKENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT EMBU
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 20 OF 2009
(Formerly CR.A. 70/04 at Nyeri)
EUSTACE IRERI……..…….………..…………………….APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC…………………………………………..……RESPONDENT
J U D G M E N T
The Appeal is rightly conceded by the state on ground 6 of the Grounds of Appeal dated 5. 05. 2010 which ground states
“That the trial before the lower court was prosecuted by an incompetent person thereby rendering the whole trial null and void.”
Although the appellant did not raise the issue, the learned counsel for the state also conceded the appeal on the ground that the charge sheet was defective. I will very briefly state why I uphold the said concession.
On the first ground, the record shows that when the plea was taken, the prosecutor was one Sgt Musila. When the matter took off for hearing, Sgt Musila also appeared as the prosecutor; he led some witnesses before IP Githae finally took over.
The law on this issue is now very clear, where a criminal case is prosecuted by an incompetent prosecutor, then those proceedings are a nullity.
The provisions of Section 85, 85(2), 86, 88(1) C.P.C. are all clear on the issue and I need not paraphrase the said provisions.
Case law led by the celebrated case of ELIREMA & ANOTHER VS REPUBLIC (2003) KLR 537; EKIMAT VS REPUBLIC; AMOS GITUMA KINYUA VS REPUBLICand many others all reiterate this position.
The proceedings herein were prosecuted by an incompetent prosecutor and they were therefore a nullity.
I also agree that the charge sheet was defective for failing to include the words “unlawful” in the particulars of charge.
The state has not asked for a retrial and given that the offence is said to have been committed over 8 years ago, such a move would not be tenable or just in the circumstances. The appellant has a good Appeal.
I allow the same and quash the conviction herein and set aside the sentence of 5 years imprisonment.
W. KARANJA
JUDGE
Delivered, dated and signed at Embu this 3rd day ofNovember 2010
In presence of:- Mr. Githinji for Magee for Appellant & Ms. Matiru for State.