[2020] KEHC 4818 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 4818 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants had satisfied the criteria for enlargement of time to file an appeal out of time, as set out in Salat v IEBC {2014} eKLR. The court also exercised its discretion under Order 42 Rule 6 to grant a stay of execution of the judgment decree, subject to the condition that the decretal...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 4818 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Euthychus Muriuki Kangangi; Applicant: Enderson Mwangonde Mwagona; Respondent: Mohammed Ali Abdalla (Suing on their own behalf and as the administrators of the estate of the late Ali Mohamed Ali)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Malindi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application 70 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time and Stay of Execution
Outcome
Application allowed with conditions.
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Stay of Execution, Enlargement of Time, Appeals Process
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Out of Time Stay of Execution Enlargement of Time Appeals Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Euthychus Muriuki Kangangi

Applicant

Enderson Mwangonde Mwagona

Applicant

Mohammed Ali Abdalla (Suing on their own behalf and as the administrators of the estate of the late Ali Mohamed Ali)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time and Stay of Execution

  1. 1 Whether the applicants have satisfied the criteria for enlargement of time to file an appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether the applicants are entitled to a stay of execution of the judgment decree pending appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants had satisfied the criteria for enlargement of time to file an appeal out of time, as set out in Salat v IEBC {2014} eKLR. The court also exercised its discretion under Order 42 Rule 6 to grant a stay of execution of the judgment decree, subject to the condition that the decretal sum be deposited in a joint interest-earning account of both counsels or, alternatively, a bank guarantee from a reputable financial institution be deposited with the Deputy Registrar within thirty days. The draft memorandum of appeal was deemed duly filed within time, and the appellants were to be supplied with the trial court record and judgment for purposes of preparing the...

Court Disposition

Application allowed with conditions.

Orders

  • Leave is granted to file an appeal out of time against part of the judgment delivered on 27.1.2019.
  • Stay of execution of the judgment decree in Civil Suit No. 5 of 2016 is granted pending the hearing and determination of the intended appeal, subject to deposit of Kshs.1,936,282 in a joint interest-earning account of both counsels within thirty days or provision of a bank guarantee from a reputable financial...