[2020] KEELC 37 (KLR)

[2020] KEELC 37 (KLR)

The court found that the 1st plaintiff was the registered proprietor of the suit land and the 2nd plaintiff had purchased the land for valuable consideration. The County Government of Siaya had no legal right or interest in the property and unlawfully trespassed by constructing structures without the plaintiffs'...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEELC 37 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Evalyne Mande Oloo; Plaintiff: Edwin Odhiambo Siala; Defendant: The County Government of Siaya; Defendant: The National Land Commission
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 281 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Land and Property Suit / Judgment
Outcome
Plaintiffs' suit allowed with orders as prayed.
Legal Topics
Ownership of Land, Trespass, Injunctions, Eviction, Land Registration, Damages for Trespass
Source Language
en
Land and Property Ownership of Land Trespass Injunctions Eviction Land Registration Damages for Trespass

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Evalyne Mande Oloo

Plaintiff

Edwin Odhiambo Siala

Plaintiff

The County Government of Siaya

Defendant

The National Land Commission

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land and Property Suit / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiffs are the lawful owners of parcel Siaya/Township Block 1/541.
  2. 2 Whether the 1st defendant unlawfully trespassed and constructed structures on the plaintiffs' land.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to a permanent injunction and eviction orders against the defendants.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the 1st plaintiff was the registered proprietor of the suit land and the 2nd plaintiff had purchased the land for valuable consideration. The County Government of Siaya had no legal right or interest in the property and unlawfully trespassed by constructing structures without the plaintiffs' consent. The plaintiffs' title was protected under the Land Registration Act, and there was no evidence of fraud or illegality in their acquisition. The court held that the plaintiffs had proved their case on a balance of probabilities and were entitled to a permanent injunction, eviction of the 1st defendant, removal of the structures, nominal damages for trespass, and costs of...

Court Disposition

Plaintiffs' suit allowed with orders as prayed.

Orders

  • A permanent injunction restraining the defendants, especially the 1st defendant, its servants and/or agents, from entering, remaining, trespassing, building structures, or interfering with the plaintiffs' quiet possession of parcel Siaya/Township Block 1/541.
  • An order directing the 1st defendant to remove the structures built on the land and for eviction from the plaintiffs' parcel Siaya/Township Block 1/541.