[2021] KEELC 2553 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 2553 (KLR)

The court found that the application to adopt the arbitral award was unopposed, and that the requirements for adoption under Section 36 of the Arbitration Act were satisfied. The arbitral proceedings were properly conducted, the award was duly executed by the relevant parties, and there was no evidence of any...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELC 2553 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Evangelizing Sisters of Mary; Respondent: Diocess of Ngong
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application 355 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Adopt Arbitral Award
Outcome
Application granted; final arbitral award adopted as judgment of the court.
Judges
BM Eboso
Legal Topics
Arbitral Award Enforcement, Adoption of Award, Land Ownership Dispute, Arbitration Act Section 36
Source Language
en
Alternative Dispute Resolution Land and Property Arbitral Award Enforcement Adoption of Award Land Ownership Dispute Arbitration Act Section 36

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Evangelizing Sisters of Mary

Applicant

Diocess of Ngong

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Adopt Arbitral Award

  1. 1 Whether the final arbitral award dated 13/7/2011 should be adopted as a judgment of the court.
  2. 2 Whether there is any valid objection to the adoption of the arbitral award.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application to adopt the arbitral award was unopposed, and that the requirements for adoption under Section 36 of the Arbitration Act were satisfied. The arbitral proceedings were properly conducted, the award was duly executed by the relevant parties, and there was no evidence of any objection or challenge to the award. Accordingly, the court exercised its jurisdiction to adopt the final arbitral award dated 13/7/2011 as a judgment of the court, granting the application as prayed.

Court Disposition

Application granted; final arbitral award adopted as judgment of the court.

Orders

  • The final arbitral award dated 13/7/2011 is adopted as a judgment of this court.
  • No order as to costs.