[2014] KEELRC 973 (KLR)

[2014] KEELRC 973 (KLR)

The court held that Section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007 provides a mandatory three-year limitation period for filing employment-related claims, and expressly removes any judicial discretion to extend this period. The applicant was dismissed on 9th November 2009, and the application for leave to file a claim was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] KEELRC 973 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Evans Mbuthia Kiai; Respondent: Delmonte Kenya Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application 10 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Claim Out of Time
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
L Ndolo
Legal Topics
Limitation Periods, Extension of Time, Unlawful Dismissal, Employment Contracts
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Limitation Periods Extension of Time Unlawful Dismissal Employment Contracts

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Evans Mbuthia Kiai

Applicant

Delmonte Kenya Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Claim Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the court has discretion to extend time for filing a claim under Section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant's delay in filing the claim is excusable under the law.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that Section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007 provides a mandatory three-year limitation period for filing employment-related claims, and expressly removes any judicial discretion to extend this period. The applicant was dismissed on 9th November 2009, and the application for leave to file a claim was made in January 2014, well outside the statutory limitation period. The applicant's reasons for delay, including criminal proceedings and financial hardship, do not override the statutory bar. Consequently, the court found it had no jurisdiction to grant leave to file the claim out of time and dismissed the application.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for leave to file a claim out of time is disallowed.
  • No order as to costs.