[2006] KEHC 1134 (KLR)
The court found that the appellant committed a serious offence against a young and innocent girl, and that the sentence of seven years imprisonment was, in fact, lenient given that the offence could attract a sentence of life imprisonment with hard labour. The trial magistrate was found to have exercised her...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2006] KEHC 1134 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Evans Ndege Moeni; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 267 of 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing Principles, Sexual Offences, Indecent Assault, Appeals Against Sentence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Evans Ndege Moeni
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of seven years imprisonment for indecent assault was harsh or excessive.
- 2 Whether the trial magistrate exercised proper discretion in sentencing the appellant.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the appellant committed a serious offence against a young and innocent girl, and that the sentence of seven years imprisonment was, in fact, lenient given that the offence could attract a sentence of life imprisonment with hard labour. The trial magistrate was found to have exercised her discretion properly in sentencing. There was no basis for interfering with the sentence, as it was neither harsh nor excessive in the circumstances. The appeal against sentence was therefore dismissed.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal against sentence is dismissed.
- The sentence of seven years imprisonment is upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
18 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAKURU
Criminal Appeal 267 of 2004
(From original conviction and sentence in Criminal Case 188 of 2004 of the Chief
Magistrate’s Court at Nakuru –A. MONGARE)
EVANS NDEGE MOENI……….......................................................……………….APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC…………………......................................................…………………RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
The appellant was charged with attempted defilement of a girl under fourteen years contrary to Section 145(2) of the Penal Code. The particular of the offence were that on 12th January 2004 at [Particulars withheld] Village in Nakuru District of Rift Valley Province he attempted to have carnal knowledge of PN, a girl under the age of fourteen years. He also faced an alternative charge of indecent assault on a female contrary to Section 141 of the Penal Code the particulars of the offence being that on the same date and place as hereinabove the appellant unlawfully and indecently assaulted PN by touching her private parts.
After a full trial, the court convicted the appellant in the alternative charge and sentenced him to seven years imprisonment. The appellant was aggrieved by the said conviction and sentence and preferred an appeal to this court against both the conviction and sentence. However, when the appeal came up for hearing he told the court that he did not intend to pursue the appeal against his conviction but only as against the sentence. He urged the court to reduce the same, saying it was harsh. On the other hand, Mr. Gumo, Assistant Deputy Public Prosecutor, urged the court to exercise its discretion and deal with the appeal appropriately.
I have carefully perused the proceedings herein. The complainant was twelve years old at the time when the said offence was committed against her. From her own evidence it appears that the appellant forcefully defiled the complainant and there was medical evidence to that effect. It is therefore not clear why the appellant was not charged with actual defilement of the complainant.
The appellant committed a very serious offence to a young and innocent girl and in my view he was given a rather lenient sentence considering that such an offence attracts a sentence of life imprisonment with hard labour. I am therefore satisfied that the trial magistrate exercised her discretion properly in handing down the said sentence to the appellant. The appellant’s appeal has no merits and I dismiss the same.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at Nakuru this 5th day of October, 2006.
D. MUSINGA
JUDGE
Judgment delivered in open court in the presence of the appellant and the Mr. Gumo, Assistant Deputy Public Prosecutor for the state.
D. MUSINGA
JUDGE