[2017] KEELRC 1123 (KLR)

[2017] KEELRC 1123 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant's employment was terminated without just cause or notice, in violation of the Employment Act. The respondents failed to provide any evidence or response to counter the claimant's assertions. The claimant was not given a fair reason for dismissal, was denied notice, did not utilize...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELRC 1123 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Evans Okongo; Respondent: Dhanjal Investments Limited; Respondent: Travellers Beach Hotel & Club
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 832 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
claim allowed
Legal Topics
Unfair Termination, Summary Dismissal, Notice Pay, Annual Leave Entitlement, Service Pay, Holiday Pay
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unfair Termination Summary Dismissal Notice Pay Annual Leave Entitlement Service Pay Holiday Pay

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Evans Okongo

Claimant

Dhanjal Investments Limited

Respondent

Travellers Beach Hotel & Club

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant's employment was unfairly terminated without just cause or notice.
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to compensation for unfair termination, annual leave pay, notice pay, service pay, and holiday pay.
  3. 3 Whether the claimant is entitled to a certificate of service and costs.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant's employment was terminated without just cause or notice, in violation of the Employment Act. The respondents failed to provide any evidence or response to counter the claimant's assertions. The claimant was not given a fair reason for dismissal, was denied notice, did not utilize his annual leave, worked holidays without compensation, and was not shown to be a beneficiary of any social security plan, making him eligible for service pay. In the absence of any counterevidence, the court accepted the claimant's evidence as unchallenged and found the termination to be unfair. The court awarded the claimant the total sum claimed, as detailed in the statement...

Court Disposition

claim allowed

Orders

  • The respondent shall pay the claimant the total sum of Kshs. 308,181 as detailed in the statement of claim.
  • Costs granted to the claimant.