[2010] KEHC 150 (KLR)

[2010] KEHC 150 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had obtained a certificate of taxation for Kshs 95,535/-, which had not been set aside or challenged by the respondent. The respondent was duly served with the application and supporting documents but failed to appear or oppose the application. The court held that, pursuant to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2010] KEHC 150 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Evans Thiga Gaturu; Respondent: Apex Security Ltd
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 192 of 2010
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs
Outcome
Judgment entered for the applicant for the certified sum with interest and costs; application allowed.
Judges
CM Njagi
Legal Topics
Taxation of Costs, Advocate Remuneration, Certificate of Taxation, Interest on Costs
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Taxation of Costs Advocate Remuneration Certificate of Taxation Interest on Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Evans Thiga Gaturu

Applicant

Apex Security Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to judgment for the sum certified in the certificate of taxation.
  2. 2 Whether interest at 14% per annum from 11th April, 2010, is payable on the taxed sum until payment in full.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent is liable for the costs of the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had obtained a certificate of taxation for Kshs 95,535/-, which had not been set aside or challenged by the respondent. The respondent was duly served with the application and supporting documents but failed to appear or oppose the application. The court held that, pursuant to Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act and Paragraph 7 of the Advocates (Remuneration) Order, the applicant was entitled to judgment for the certified sum, together with interest at 14% per annum from one month after service of the bill until payment in full. The respondent was also ordered to pay the costs of the application. The absence of opposition and the finality of the...

Court Disposition

Judgment entered for the applicant for the certified sum with interest and costs; application allowed.

Orders

  • Judgment is entered for the applicant against the respondent for Kshs 95,535/- together with interest at 14% per annum from 11th April, 2010, until payment in full.
  • The respondent shall bear the costs of this application.