[2002] KECA 258 (KLR)
The Court of Appeal found that the circumstances justified a review of the Deputy Registrar's exercise of discretion. Persuaded by the arguments of the respondent's counsel, the court determined that the balance due should be reduced to K.Shs. 63,734. The court further exercised its discretion to make no order as to...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2002] KECA 258 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Evanson Gitau; Respondent: R & K Investments Ltd
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 182 of 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Reference From Deputy Registrar's Decision
- Outcome
- balance reduced; no order as to costs
- Legal Topics
- Review of Registrar Decision, Discretion of Court, Costs Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Evanson Gitau
Appellant
R & K Investments Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Reference From Deputy Registrar's Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Deputy Registrar's exercise of discretion should be reviewed by the Court of Appeal.
- 2 Whether the balance due should be reduced as argued by the respondent's counsel.
- 3 Whether costs should be awarded for attendance on the reference.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal found that the circumstances justified a review of the Deputy Registrar's exercise of discretion. Persuaded by the arguments of the respondent's counsel, the court determined that the balance due should be reduced to K.Shs. 63,734. The court further exercised its discretion to make no order as to costs for attendance on the reference, indicating that each party should bear its own costs for this application. The ruling demonstrates the appellate court's willingness to intervene where the lower court's or registrar's discretion is shown to have been exercised on improper grounds or where justice so demands.
Court Disposition
balance reduced; no order as to costs
Orders
- The balance due is reduced to K.Shs. 63,734.
- No order as to costs for attendance on this reference.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
13 paragraphs
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
AT NAIROBI
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 182 OF 1998
BETWEEN
EVANSON GITAU ........................................................ APPELLANT
AND
R & K INVESTMENTS LTD.................................... RESPONDENT (Appeal from the Judgment and Decree of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Justice Msagha Mbogholi dated 17th July, 1998
in H.C.C.C. NO. 2287 OF 1995) ******************
R U L I N G
Having heard counsel, I am persuaded by Mr. Kithinji that this is a proper case for a review of the discretion exercised by the Deputy Registrar. Accordingly and for the reasons he advanced, I reduce the balance to K.Shs.63,734/= . I will make no order as to costs for attendance on this reference. Made at Nairobi this 6th day of May, 2002.
A.A. LAKHA ................... JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a true copy of the original.
DEPUTY REGISTRAR