[2006] KEHC 1439 (KLR)

[2006] KEHC 1439 (KLR)

The court found that the 1st Defendant died in 2002 and no steps were taken to substitute a legal representative in his place. As the application was unopposed and the facts were not controverted, the court held that, by operation of Order XXIII Rule 3(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules, the suit had abated as against...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2006] KEHC 1439 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Evanson Laboso Johana Kipchumba; Defendant: Kassamali Mulji Gilani; Applicant: Wilbay Ltd.
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 61B of 1999
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Application for Abatement Due to Death of Defendant
Outcome
Application allowed. Suit abated as against the 1st Defendant.
Legal Topics
Abatement of Suit, Death of Party, Substitution of Parties
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Abatement of Suit Death of Party Substitution of Parties

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Evanson Laboso Johana Kipchumba

Plaintiff

Kassamali Mulji Gilani

Defendant

Wilbay Ltd.

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Application for Abatement Due to Death of Defendant

  1. 1 Whether the suit has abated as against the 1st Defendant due to his death and no legal representative being placed on record.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the 1st Defendant died in 2002 and no steps were taken to substitute a legal representative in his place. As the application was unopposed and the facts were not controverted, the court held that, by operation of Order XXIII Rule 3(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules, the suit had abated as against the 1st Defendant. The court accordingly allowed the application and ordered abatement of the suit against the deceased defendant.

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Suit abated as against the 1st Defendant.

Orders

  • The suit herein has abated as against the 1st Defendant.
  • Costs of the application shall be in the cause.