[2006] KEHC 1993 (KLR)
The court found that the 1st Defendant died in 2000 and no steps were taken to substitute a legal representative in his place. As the application was unopposed and the facts were not controverted, the court held that, pursuant to Order XXIII Rule 3(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules, the suit had abated as against the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2006] KEHC 1993 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Evanson Laboso Johana Kipchumba; Defendant: Kassamali Mulji Gilani; Applicant: Wilbay Ltd.
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kakamega
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 61B of 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Ruling on Application for Abatement
- Outcome
- application allowed; suit abated as against 1st Defendant
- Legal Topics
- Abatement of Suit, Death of Party, Substitution of Parties
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Evanson Laboso Johana Kipchumba
Plaintiff
Kassamali Mulji Gilani
Defendant
Wilbay Ltd.
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Application for Abatement
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the suit has abated as against the 1st Defendant due to his death and failure to substitute a legal representative.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the 1st Defendant died in 2000 and no steps were taken to substitute a legal representative in his place. As the application was unopposed and the facts were not controverted, the court held that, pursuant to Order XXIII Rule 3(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules, the suit had abated as against the 1st Defendant. The application was therefore allowed and the suit marked as abated against the 1st Defendant.
Court Disposition
application allowed; suit abated as against 1st Defendant
Orders
- The suit herein has abated as against the 1st Defendant.
- Costs of the application shall be in the cause.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
15 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT KAKAMEGA
Civil Case 61B of 1999
EVANSON LABOSO
JOHANA KIPCHUMBA ...................................................................................PLAINTIFF
V E R S U S
KASSAMALI MULJI GILANI .....................................................................DEFENDANT
R U L I N G
The Ruling is on the application by Chamber Summons dated 28. 7.05 by Wilbay Ltd., described as the Interested Party. The said application sought an order that the suit has abated as against the 1st Defendant because the latter died way back in the year 2000 and no personal representative was been placed on record. The application was not opposed by the plaintiff who was served, vide the affidavit of service sworn on 28. 11. 05 by Rodgers C. Fundi, a process server.
As the allegations made in the application and in particular the supporting affidavit sworn by I. S. Kuloba, an advocate, have not been contraverted, the 1st Defendant having died in the year 2002 and no step having been taken since to place the legal representative in the suit in place of the 1st Defendant, the suit had, by virtue of Rules 3 (2) of Order XXIII of the Civil Procedure Rules abated as against the 1st Defendant.
Accordingly, I allow the application and order that the suit herein has abated as against the 1st Defendant. Costs of the application shall be in the cause.
Dated at Kakamega this 24th day of February 2006
G. B. M. KARIUKI
J U D G E