[2017] KEELRC 1740 (KLR)
The court found that the medical evidence provided by the respondent was not persuasive or sufficient to justify setting aside the order closing her case. The medical note did not grant a formal off-day, was not properly authenticated, and did not bear the treating doctor's name or hospital stamp. The court...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEELRC 1740 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Evelyne Musimbi Enonda; Respondent: Jerida Anyonga
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 1092 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Cause / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Order Closing Respondent's Case
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Adjournment of Hearing, Medical Evidence, Setting Aside Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Evelyne Musimbi Enonda
Applicant
Jerida Anyonga
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Order Closing Respondent's Case
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent has provided sufficient medical evidence to justify setting aside the order closing her case.
- 2 Whether the court should exercise its discretion to reopen the respondent's case based on the evidence presented.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the medical evidence provided by the respondent was not persuasive or sufficient to justify setting aside the order closing her case. The medical note did not grant a formal off-day, was not properly authenticated, and did not bear the treating doctor's name or hospital stamp. The court emphasized that its discretion to set aside orders or reopen cases requires credible and persuasive evidence, which was lacking in this instance. Consequently, the application to set aside the order closing the respondent's case was dismissed, and the matter was set for judgment.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application to set aside the order closing the respondent's case is dismissed.
- The court will proceed to grant a judgment date.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT
AT NAIROBI
CAUSE NO. 1092 OF 2015
EVELYNE MUSIMBI ENONDA …………………..........CLAIMANT
VERSUS
JERIDA ANYONGA ……………………….…....….RESPONDENT
Claimant in person
Mwendwa, Macharia, Mwangi & Co. Advocates for respondent
RULING
1. The applicant in the notice of motion filed on 11/8/2016 seeks the courts not to deliver judgment in this matter before hearing the defence case.
2. The claimant presented his case and was cross examined by counsel for the respondent.
3. Defence hearing was set for 22nd July 2016 when the respondent counsel informed the court that the respondent was ill and was admitted in hospital and was unable to attend court therefore Counsel for the claimant left the matter to court.
4. The court made the following order “As case was slated for hearing today and there is no evidence of the stated hospitalisation, court declines application for adjournment.”
5. The respondent’s counsel Mr. Macharia told the court as follows “We will file submissions. I need 3 weeks.”
6. The court proceeded to give directions on the filing of submissions.
7. The application to set aside the order to close the respondent’s case is supported by an affidavit of the respondent sworn on 4th April 2016 to which is attached a photocopy of a medical note dated 21. 7.2014 from the Nairobi Women’s Hospital. The document shows that the respondent was admitted at the hospital on 21/7/2016 and discharged on the same date. She had been diagnosed with dehydration and was attended to by Dr. Ndolo. The copy is certified to be a copy of the original.
8. Attached to the medical note is a letter dated 21/7/2016 “to whom it may concern”but does not bear the name of Dr. Ndolo nor a stamp of the hospital.
9. There has to be persuasive evidence for a court to interfere with the discretion of a trial judge. The document presented to me is not such persuasive evidence in that the purported one day off-day was not granted by the doctor who treated the patient.
10. For these reasons the application is dismissed and the court will proceed to grant a judgment date.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 24th day of February 2017
MATHEWS NDERI NDUMA
PRINCIPAL JUDGE