[2008] KEHC 42 (KLR)

[2008] KEHC 42 (KLR)

The court found that the Plaintiff's further affidavit was filed out of time and without leave of the court, in direct contravention of the court order issued on 25th July 2007. The Plaintiff, being represented by counsel, was aware of the requirement to seek leave for late filing but failed to do so and provided no...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2008] KEHC 42 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Everest Limited; Defendant: Katherine Wambui Kuria
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 187 of 2007
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Preliminary Objection Regarding Late Affidavit
Outcome
Preliminary Objection upheld; Plaintiff's further affidavit expunged from the record with costs to the Defendant.
Judges
JL Osiemo
Legal Topics
Affidavit Filing Timelines, Preliminary Objection, Specific Performance, Injunctive Relief
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Affidavit Filing Timelines Preliminary Objection Specific Performance Injunctive Relief

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Everest Limited

Plaintiff

Katherine Wambui Kuria

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Preliminary Objection Regarding Late Affidavit

  1. 1 Whether the Plaintiff's further affidavit filed out of time without leave of court should be expunged from the record.
  2. 2 Whether the court's order on filing timelines can be disregarded without consequence.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Plaintiff's further affidavit was filed out of time and without leave of the court, in direct contravention of the court order issued on 25th July 2007. The Plaintiff, being represented by counsel, was aware of the requirement to seek leave for late filing but failed to do so and provided no explanation for this failure. The court emphasized that its orders must be respected and cannot be disregarded with impunity. Consequently, the court upheld the Defendant's Preliminary Objection and ordered that the Plaintiff's further affidavit be expunged from the record, with costs to the Defendant.

Court Disposition

Preliminary Objection upheld; Plaintiff's further affidavit expunged from the record with costs to the Defendant.

Orders

  • The further affidavit filed by the Plaintiff on 30th August 2007 is expunged from the record.
  • Costs of the Preliminary Objection are awarded to the Defendant.