[2017] KEELC 332 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 332 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated sufficient grounds to warrant the grant of leave to enter appearance and file a defence out of time, primarily due to the mistakes of his advocate and the need to allow a hearing on the merits. The court also found that the suit land 905/GIMARIAN/MWEMBE was not...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELC 332 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Everlyne Andiva Maloba; Defendant: Phelix Esabu Omido
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 217 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Enter Appearance and Set Aside/vary Orders
Outcome
application allowed in part
Judges
NA Matheka
Legal Topics
Setting Aside Ex Parte Orders, Leave to File Defence Out of Time, Burial Rights, Locus Standi, Non Existent Land, Costs Orders
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Setting Aside Ex Parte Orders Leave to File Defence Out of Time Burial Rights Locus Standi Non Existent Land Costs Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Everlyne Andiva Maloba

Plaintiff

Phelix Esabu Omido

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Enter Appearance and Set Aside/vary Orders

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to enter appearance and file defence out of time.
  2. 2 Whether the orders made on 26th July 2017 should be varied or set aside.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to the release of the deceased's body for burial on the claimed land.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated sufficient grounds to warrant the grant of leave to enter appearance and file a defence out of time, primarily due to the mistakes of his advocate and the need to allow a hearing on the merits. The court also found that the suit land 905/GIMARIAN/MWEMBE was not shown to exist, and there was no evidence that the plaintiff/respondent had any claim or right over the deceased's actual land, L.R. KAKAMEGA/IVORA/899. The orders of 26th July 2017 were therefore varied to allow the burial of the deceased elsewhere other than on the disputed, non-existent land. The court emphasized that ex parte orders obtained without proper disclosure or...

Court Disposition

application allowed in part

Orders

  • The applicant is granted leave to enter appearance and file defence and serve within 14 days.
  • The orders made on 26th July 2017 are varied; the body of the late Ezekiel Esabu Odemu to be released to the applicant for burial elsewhere other than on 905/GIMARIAN/MWEMBE.