[2022] KEELRC 858 (KLR)

[2022] KEELRC 858 (KLR)

The court found that the application for review was filed over 20 months after the judgment without any explanation for the delay, rendering the delay inordinate and unjustified. The Respondents failed to comply with express court directions to serve the person alleged to have signed the conciliation agreement...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEELRC 858 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Everlyne Atieno Awuor et al.; Respondent: Migori County Government; Respondent: Migori County Public Service Board
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 323 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Ruling on Motion to Review/vary/set Aside Judgment
Outcome
Motion dismissed save for leave to come on record.
Legal Topics
Review of Judgment, Conciliation Agreements, Misrepresentation, Delay in Application, Service of Process
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Review of Judgment Conciliation Agreements Misrepresentation Delay in Application Service of Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Everlyne Atieno Awuor et al.

Applicant

Migori County Government

Respondent

Migori County Public Service Board

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Review Application / Ruling on Motion to Review/vary/set Aside Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the judgment delivered on 9 July 2019 should be reviewed, varied, or set aside due to alleged misrepresentation in the conciliation agreement.
  2. 2 Whether the application for review was filed within a reasonable time and if the delay was explained.
  3. 3 Whether the Respondents complied with court directions regarding service of the motion and affidavits.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application for review was filed over 20 months after the judgment without any explanation for the delay, rendering the delay inordinate and unjustified. The Respondents failed to comply with express court directions to serve the person alleged to have signed the conciliation agreement without authority and to file affidavits of service to demonstrate that the Claimants were served. The court concluded that these procedural failures, combined with the unexplained delay, were fatal to the application. Consequently, the court declined to review, vary, or set aside the judgment, except to grant leave for the firm of Prof Tom Ojienda & Associates to come on record for...

Court Disposition

Motion dismissed save for leave to come on record.

Orders

  • The firm of Prof Tom Ojienda & Associates is granted leave to come on record for the Respondents.
  • The Motion dated 30 March 2021 is dismissed.