[2018] KEHC 4444 (KLR)
The court, having previously certified the matter as urgent and directed service on the respondent, found that neither party appeared for the scheduled hearing. In the absence of both parties, the court exercised its discretion to return the file to the originating High Court at Kakamega for further directions and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 4444 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Everlyne C. Inganji; Appellant: Meshack Bulinda Ingati; Respondent: Stephen Ingati Ashaka
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kakamega
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 116 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Interlocutory Order; File Transfer for Further Directions
- Outcome
- File returned to Kakamega High Court for further directions; no substantive orders on the merits.
- Judges
- RE Aburili
- Legal Topics
- Urgent Application, Ex Parte Hearing, Service of Process
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Everlyne C. Inganji
Appellant
Meshack Bulinda Ingati
Appellant
Stephen Ingati Ashaka
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Interlocutory Order; File Transfer for Further Directions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the matter was urgent and required ex parte consideration.
- 2 Whether parties were properly served and present for the hearing.
- 3 Whether the file should be returned to the originating court for further directions.
Ratio Decidendi
The court, having previously certified the matter as urgent and directed service on the respondent, found that neither party appeared for the scheduled hearing. In the absence of both parties, the court exercised its discretion to return the file to the originating High Court at Kakamega for further directions and consideration. This ensures that the matter is handled by the appropriate court and that parties are afforded a further opportunity to participate in the proceedings, in line with principles of fairness and due process.
Court Disposition
File returned to Kakamega High Court for further directions; no substantive orders on the merits.
Orders
- The file is to be returned to Kakamega High Court for further directions and consideration.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
16 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KAKAMEGA
CIVIL APPEAL CASE NO. 116 OF 2018
EVERLYNE C. INGANJI ................................ 1ST APPLICANT
MESHACK BULINDA INGATI .................... 2ND APPLICANT
VERSUS
STEPHEN INGATI ASHAKA ........................... RESPONDENT
( FORWARDED FOR HEARING BY D.R. KISUMU BEFORE VACATION DUTY JUDGE - SIAYA)
COURT ORDER:
It is now 12. 00 p.m. This matter was considered yesterday exparte and I certified it as urgent and directed the Applicant/Appellant to serve the Respondent for consideration today.
Neither Applicant nor the Respondent have appeared.
Accordingly, I direct that the file be returned to Kakamega High Court for further directions and consideration.
Orders accordingly.
Dated, Signed and Delivered at Siaya this 31st day of August, 2018.
R. E. ABURILI
JUDGE