[2018] KEHC 4453 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 4453 (KLR)

The court found that while the application was urgent and certified it as such for consideration during the recess, the substantive prayers for a temporary injunction and preservation of the body were serious and required the respondent to be served and heard. Granting such orders ex parte would amount to the court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 4453 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Everlyne C. Inganji; Applicant: Meshack Bulinda Ingati; Respondent: Stephen Ingati Ashaka
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 116 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Interlocutory Application for Injunction During Recess
Outcome
Application certified urgent; substantive prayers for injunction deferred for inter partes hearing.
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Temporary Injunctions, Burial Disputes, Urgent Applications
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Family and Children Temporary Injunctions Burial Disputes Urgent Applications

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Everlyne C. Inganji

Applicant

Meshack Bulinda Ingati

Applicant

Stephen Ingati Ashaka

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Interlocutory Application for Injunction During Recess

  1. 1 Whether the application for a temporary injunction to restrain the respondent from removing the body pending hearing is urgent and should be certified as such.
  2. 2 Whether the court should grant interim orders ex parte or require inter partes hearing.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that while the application was urgent and certified it as such for consideration during the recess, the substantive prayers for a temporary injunction and preservation of the body were serious and required the respondent to be served and heard. Granting such orders ex parte would amount to the court prosecuting the application for the applicant, which is improper. Therefore, the court directed that the respondent be served and the matter be set down for inter partes hearing, declining to grant the substantive interim orders at this stage.

Court Disposition

Application certified urgent; substantive prayers for injunction deferred for inter partes hearing.

Orders

  • Application certified as urgent for consideration during the recess.
  • Applicant or counsel to serve the respondent and appear on 31.8.2018 to urge the application for injunction.