[2020] KEELRC 1711 (KLR)

[2020] KEELRC 1711 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant was summarily dismissed without a valid reason and without adherence to the mandatory procedural requirements under the Employment Act, 2007. The respondent failed to provide the claimant with notice, an opportunity to be heard, or to respond to the allegations against her. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEELRC 1711 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Everlyne Shikhonyi Lusenji; Respondent: Board of Management, Shikokho Secondary School (being sued through its Chair)
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Bungoma
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 50 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the claimant.
Judges
MN Nduma
Legal Topics
Unfair Dismissal, Summary Dismissal, Procedural Fairness, Arrear Salary, Compensation, Employee Rights
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unfair Dismissal Summary Dismissal Procedural Fairness Arrear Salary Compensation Employee Rights

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Everlyne Shikhonyi Lusenji

Claimant

Board of Management, Shikokho Secondary School (being sued through its Chair)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant's summary dismissal was unlawful and unfair.
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to arrear salary from April 2015 to June 2016.
  3. 3 Whether the claimant is entitled to compensation for unfair dismissal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant was summarily dismissed without a valid reason and without adherence to the mandatory procedural requirements under the Employment Act, 2007. The respondent failed to provide the claimant with notice, an opportunity to be heard, or to respond to the allegations against her. The court was satisfied that the claimant had discharged her burden of proof and that the dismissal was both substantively and procedurally unfair. The claimant was also unlawfully denied her salary for 15.5 months prior to dismissal. The court awarded the claimant arrear salary and the maximum compensation for unfair dismissal, finding that she had served diligently for over 15 years...

Court Disposition

Judgment for the claimant.

Orders

  • The respondent shall pay the claimant Kshs. 287,370 being 15.5 months arrear salary.
  • The respondent shall pay the claimant Kshs. 222,480 being the equivalent of 12 months salary in compensation.