[2021] KECA 1084 (KLR)

[2021] KECA 1084 (KLR)

The Court found that the respondents filed the notice of appeal 261 days after the judgment, far outside the 14-day period required by Rule 75(2) of the Court of Appeal Rules, and without seeking leave for extension. The applicants' application to strike out the notice of appeal was filed within 30 days of service,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KECA 1084 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Ewoton Leonard Ekutian; Applicant: Pius Atok Ewoton; Respondent: Michael Kore Rotich; Respondent: Peter Ngetich; Respondent: Allan Chelimo; Respondent: John Kipkosgei Chelimo; Respondent: Jane Chesang
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 146 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application to Strike Out Notice of Appeal
Outcome
application allowed; notice of appeal struck out with costs to applicants
Judges
J Karanja, A Mohammed
Legal Topics
Notice of Appeal, Court of Appeal Rules, Filing Out of Time, Striking Out Procedure
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Notice of Appeal Court of Appeal Rules Filing Out of Time Striking Out Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ewoton Leonard Ekutian

Applicant

Pius Atok Ewoton

Applicant

Michael Kore Rotich

Respondent

Peter Ngetich

Respondent

Allan Chelimo

Respondent

John Kipkosgei Chelimo

Respondent

Jane Chesang

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Application to Strike Out Notice of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the notice of appeal was filed outside the prescribed period under Rule 75(2) of the Court of Appeal Rules.
  2. 2 Whether the application to strike out the notice of appeal was filed within the time limit set by Rule 84 of the Court of Appeal Rules.
  3. 3 Whether the notice of appeal should be struck out for non-compliance with mandatory procedural rules.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the respondents filed the notice of appeal 261 days after the judgment, far outside the 14-day period required by Rule 75(2) of the Court of Appeal Rules, and without seeking leave for extension. The applicants' application to strike out the notice of appeal was filed within 30 days of service, thus complying with the mandatory requirements of Rule 84. The Court emphasized that compliance with procedural timelines is mandatory and failure to do so renders the notice of appeal incompetent. Consequently, the notice of appeal was struck out as it was filed out of time and without leave, and the application to strike it out was properly before the Court.

Court Disposition

application allowed; notice of appeal struck out with costs to applicants

Orders

  • The notice of appeal dated 22nd October, 2019 is struck out.
  • Costs awarded to the applicants.