https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/7991

https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/7991

The Applicant produced a certified copy of the arbitral award and the arbitration agreement, establishing compliance with section 36(3) of the Arbitration Act. The Award was domestic, the Respondent offered no opposition, no application to set aside the Award had been made, and no ground under section 37 was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KEHC 7991 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Export-Hydro Pump & Services (Africa) Limited; Respondent: Regional Ventures Limited
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application E230 of 2026
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Application for Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Award / Ruling on Chamber Summons
Outcome
Application allowed in part
Judges
["MO Ado"]
Legal Topics
Recognition and Enforcement of Domestic Arbitral Awards, Section 36 Arbitration Act Requirements, Grounds for Refusal Under Section 37 Arbitration Act, Effect of Absent Opposition in Enforcement Application, No Power to Vary Arbitral Award at Enforcement Stage
Source Language
en
Arbitration Commercial Law Civil Procedure Recognition and Enforcement of Domestic Arbitral Awards Section 36 Arbitration Act Requirements Grounds for Refusal Under Section 37 Arbitration Act Effect of Absent Opposition in Enforcement Application No Power to Vary Arbitral Award at Enforcement Stage

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Export-Hydro Pump & Services (Africa) Limited

Applicant

Regional Ventures Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Civil Application for Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Award / Ruling on Chamber Summons

  1. 1 Whether the Applicant satisfied the statutory requirements for recognition and enforcement of the arbitral award under sections 36 and 37 of the Arbitration Act, 1995.
  2. 2 Whether any ground for refusal of recognition or enforcement under section 37 was established.
  3. 3 Whether the court could include KES 103,000.00 allegedly paid toward arbitrator’s fees in the enforcement order.

Ratio Decidendi

The Applicant produced a certified copy of the arbitral award and the arbitration agreement, establishing compliance with section 36(3) of the Arbitration Act. The Award was domestic, the Respondent offered no opposition, no application to set aside the Award had been made, and no ground under section 37 was demonstrated. The court therefore had no basis to refuse recognition and enforcement. However, the court could not add KES 103,000.00 to the award because enforcement is limited to adopting the award as made, not varying it.

Court Disposition

Application allowed in part

Orders

  • The Final Award published by Mercy Okiro, FCIArb, on 17th June 2025 is recognised as binding and adopted as a judgment of the court.
  • Leave is granted to the Applicant to enforce the Award as a decree of the court.