https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/7991
The Applicant produced a certified copy of the arbitral award and the arbitration agreement, establishing compliance with section 36(3) of the Arbitration Act. The Award was domestic, the Respondent offered no opposition, no application to set aside the Award had been made, and no ground under section 37 was...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2026] KEHC 7991 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Export-Hydro Pump & Services (Africa) Limited; Respondent: Regional Ventures Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Civil Application E230 of 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Civil Application for Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Award / Ruling on Chamber Summons
- Outcome
- Application allowed in part
- Judges
- ["MO Ado"]
- Legal Topics
- Recognition and Enforcement of Domestic Arbitral Awards, Section 36 Arbitration Act Requirements, Grounds for Refusal Under Section 37 Arbitration Act, Effect of Absent Opposition in Enforcement Application, No Power to Vary Arbitral Award at Enforcement Stage
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Export-Hydro Pump & Services (Africa) Limited
Applicant
Regional Ventures Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Application for Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Award / Ruling on Chamber Summons
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Applicant satisfied the statutory requirements for recognition and enforcement of the arbitral award under sections 36 and 37 of the Arbitration Act, 1995.
- 2 Whether any ground for refusal of recognition or enforcement under section 37 was established.
- 3 Whether the court could include KES 103,000.00 allegedly paid toward arbitrator’s fees in the enforcement order.
Ratio Decidendi
The Applicant produced a certified copy of the arbitral award and the arbitration agreement, establishing compliance with section 36(3) of the Arbitration Act. The Award was domestic, the Respondent offered no opposition, no application to set aside the Award had been made, and no ground under section 37 was demonstrated. The court therefore had no basis to refuse recognition and enforcement. However, the court could not add KES 103,000.00 to the award because enforcement is limited to adopting the award as made, not varying it.
Court Disposition
Application allowed in part
Orders
- The Final Award published by Mercy Okiro, FCIArb, on 17th June 2025 is recognised as binding and adopted as a judgment of the court.
- Leave is granted to the Applicant to enforce the Award as a decree of the court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Export-Hydro Pump & Services (Africa) Ltd v Regional Ventures Ltd (Miscellaneous Civil Application E230 of 2026) [2026] KEHC 7991 (KLR) (Commercial and Tax) (4 June 2026) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2026] KEHC 7991 (KLR) Republic of Kenya In the High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts) Commercial and Tax Miscellaneous Civil Application E230 of 2026 MO Ado, J June 4, 2026 IN THE MATTER OF THE ARBITRATION ACT, 1995 AND IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF AN ARBITRAL AWARD Between Export-Hydro Pump & Services (Africa) Limited Applicant and Regional Ventures Limited Respondent Ruling 1.Before the court is the Chamber Summons dated 27th January 2026 brought under sections 36 and 37 of the Arbitration Act, 1995 and Rules 4 and 6 of the Arbitration Rules, 1997. The Applicant seeks recognition and enforcement of the Final Award published by the Sole Arbitrator, Mercy Okiro, FCIArb, on 17th June 2025 as a decree of this court. 2.The application is supported by the affidavit of Boris Oyier Onong sworn on 27th January 2026. The Applicant has annexed a copy of the Contract Agreement dated 9th January 2023 containing an arbitration clause and a certified copy of the Final Award. 3.The application was served upon the Respondent. Despite service, the Respondent neither entered appearance nor filed any response in opposition thereto. 4.The material before the court shows that the parties entered into a contract for borehole drilling and construction works. The agreement contained an arbitration clause providing that disputes arising therefrom would be referred to arbitration and that the arbitral award would be final and binding upon the parties. 5.A dispute subsequently arose between the parties concerning payment under the contract. The dispute was referred to arbitration and culminated in a Consent Award published on 17th June 2025. Under the Award, the Respondent agreed to settle the sum of KES 1,120,000.00 by monthly instalments and to bear the outstanding costs of the arbitration. 6.Section 36(1) of the Arbitration Act provides that a domestic arbitral award shall be recognised as binding and, upon application in writing to the High Court, shall be enforced subject to sections 36 and 37 of the Act. Section 36(3) requires the party seeking enforcement to furnish the original arbitral award or a certified copy thereof and the original arbitration agreement or a certified copy thereof. 7.The Applicant has complied with the requirements of section 36(3) of the Act by exhibiting a copy of the arbitration agreement and a certified copy of the Award. The Award is a domestic arbitral award within the meaning of the Act. 8.The court's role at this stage is limited. It is not concerned with the merits of the award but only whether the statutory requirements for recognition and enforcement have been met and whether any of the grounds for refusal set out in section 37 of the Act have been established. 9.In Tanzania National Roads Agency v Kundan Singh Construction Limited [2013] eKLR, the Court observed that recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards follows as a matter of course once the requirements of section 36 have been satisfied and none of the grounds under section 37 have been established. I respectfully agree. 10.In the present case, no application has been made to set aside the Award under section 35 of the Act. Equally, no material has been placed before the court to demonstrate any of the grounds contemplated under section 37 of the Act. There is therefore no basis upon which the court may decline recognition and enforcement of the Award. 11.The Applicant has also urged the court to include the sum of KES 103,000.00 allegedly paid by it on account of the Respondent's share of the arbitrator's fees. While the Award records that the Respondent was to bear the outstanding arbitral costs, the court's mandate under section 36 is to recognise and enforce the arbitral award as made. It is not open to the court, at the enforcement stage, to vary, add to, or amend the terms of the award. Any entitlement to reimbursement must be founded upon the Award itself or pursued in appropriate proceedings. 12.I am therefore satisfied that the Applicant has met the requirements for recognition and enforcement of the arbitral award. 13.Accordingly, the Chamber Summons dated 27th January 2026 is allowed on the following terms:i.The Final Award published by Mercy Okiro, FCIArb, on 17th June 2025 is hereby recognised as binding and is adopted as a judgment of this Court.ii.Leave is granted to the Applicant to enforce the said Award as a decree of this Court.iii.The prayer seeking inclusion of KES 103,000.00 allegedly paid by the Applicant towards the Respondent's share of the arbitrator's fees is declined. 14.The Applicant shall have the costs of this application. 15.It is so ordered. DATED, SIGNED, AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 4TH DAY OF JUNE 2026HON. MR. JUSTICE MOSES ADOJUDGE OF THE HIGH COURTIn the Presence of:Moses C/A………………for the Applicant……………for the Respondent