[2012] KEHC 3795 (KLR)
The court found that the plea of guilty was properly taken, as the charges were read in Kiswahili and the appellant unequivocally admitted to the offences. The facts presented supported the charges of burglary and stealing. The appellant's claim of a love affair with the complainant was deemed an afterthought and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2012] KEHC 3795 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Ezekiel Musyoki Mutisya; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Machakos
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 100 of 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on First Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence upheld
- Judges
- GMA Dulu
- Legal Topics
- Burglary, Stealing, Handling Stolen Goods, Plea of Guilty, Sentencing Principles
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ezekiel Musyoki Mutisya
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on First Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plea of guilty was properly taken and entered in accordance with the law.
- 2 Whether the conviction for burglary and stealing was supported by the facts and the law.
- 3 Whether the sentence imposed was legal, harsh, or excessive.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plea of guilty was properly taken, as the charges were read in Kiswahili and the appellant unequivocally admitted to the offences. The facts presented supported the charges of burglary and stealing. The appellant's claim of a love affair with the complainant was deemed an afterthought and not credible. The court agreed with the State that the sentences were to run concurrently, resulting in a total imprisonment term of 3 years and 4 months, which was neither harsh, illegal, nor excessive. Consequently, the appeal against both conviction and sentence was dismissed, and the original orders of the trial court were upheld.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence upheld
Orders
- The appeal against conviction is dismissed.
- The appeal against sentence is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT
AT MACHAKOS
Criminal Appeal 100 of 2010
EZEKIEL MUSYOKI MUTISYA ……….……….............…..…………………..…..... APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC …………………………………………………………………………. RESPONDENT
(Being an appeal from the conviction and sentence of the Senior Resident Magistrate
A.W. Mwangi delivered on 21/1/2010 in Kithimani Criminal Case No. 47 of 2010)
J U D G M E N T
The appellant was charged with two counts of burglary and stealing contrary to section 304(1) (a) and section 279(b) of the Penal Code. In the alternative, he was charged with handling stolen goods contrary to section 382(1) of the Penal Code. He was recorded as having pleaded guilty to counts 1 and 2 each of which was for burglary and stealing. He was convicted of the same. On 21st January 2010, he was sentenced to serve 3 years imprisonment on the 1st limb, and 4 months imprisonment on the 2nd limb for each of the two counts. The sentences were to run concurrently.
He has now appealed to this court against both conviction and sentence. His grounds of appeal are that he was given the alleged stolen items by his sister in law (one of the complainants). He claimed that he pleaded guilty to the charges in order to cover up a love affair, which he has had with his sister in law. He stated that he is 23 years old, and that the court should consider the circumstances of his case and reduce his sentence.
At the hearing of the appeal, the appellant relied on his grounds of appeal. He stated that he was sentenced to serve a total of 6 years, 8 months imprisonment.
Learned State Counsel, Mr Mukofu, supported the conviction and sentence. Counsel clarified that the sentences were to run concurrently. Therefore the total sentence was 3 years 4 months imprisonment.
This is a first appeal. I am required to review the record and come to my own conclusions.
I have perused the record of the subordinate court. The charges were read to the accused in Kiswahili. He was recorded as having answered “it is true”on each of the two main counts. The facts were thereafter given. The appellant accepted the facts as correct.
In my view, the plea was properly taken. The language used was Kiswahili. The facts as given disclose both offences. The facts disclose breaking and theft of items. In my view, the accused’s story of having had a love affair with the complainant in count 1, is an afterthought. He is finding ways to get sympathy. I dismiss the appeal against conviction.
On sentence, though the appellant claims that the total sentence was 6 years, 8 months imprisonment, I agree with the learned State Counsel that the sentences on both counts having been ordered to run concurrently, he is to serve only a total sentence of 3 years and 4 months imprisonment. The concurrent sentence is neither harsh, illegal or excessive. I will uphold the same.
In the result, I dismiss the appeal both against conviction and sentence. I confirm that the total concurrent sentence is 3 years 4 months imprisonment.
It is so ordered.
Dated and delivered at Machakos this 11thday of June 2012.
George Dulu
Judge
In presence of:-
Applicant in person
N/A for State
Mueni – Court clerk.`