[2020] KEHC 1488 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant failed to provide any evidence of pauperism or points of law that would warrant consideration in a second appeal. Additionally, the application was not supported by a sworn affidavit as required. Consequently, the court declined and dismissed the application for leave to appeal as...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEHC 1488 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Ezekiel Onyango Aloo; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Siaya
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application E007 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- RE Aburili
- Legal Topics
- Pauper Appeals, Second Appeal, Court of Appeal Rules
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ezekiel Onyango Aloo
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant qualifies for leave to appeal as a pauper under Rule 113 of the Court of Appeal Rules.
- 2 Whether there are points of law meriting consideration in a second appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant failed to provide any evidence of pauperism or points of law that would warrant consideration in a second appeal. Additionally, the application was not supported by a sworn affidavit as required. Consequently, the court declined and dismissed the application for leave to appeal as a pauper.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application is declined and dismissed.
- File closed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
17 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT SIAYA
MISC. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. E007 OF 2020
CORAM: HON. R.E. ABURILI J
EZEKIEL ONYANGO ALOO.....APPLICANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC................................RESPONDENT
RULING
1. I have considered the Application under Rule 113 of Court of Appeal Rules.
2. I find no evidence of pauperism or points of law for consideration in a second appeal. The application is unsupported by any sworn affidavit.
3. The same is hereby declined and dismissed.
4. File closed.
5. Orders accordingly.
Dated, signed and Delivered at Siaya, this 16th Day of November, 2020
R.E. ABURILI
JUDGE