[2019] KEHC 3856 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 3856 (KLR)

The court found that despite a positive probation report, the applicant had not demonstrated remorse or made any effort to compensate the victim, who suffered serious injuries and opposed a non-custodial sentence. The assault was aggravated by the fact that it was motivated by the victim's testimony in a previous...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 3856 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Ezekiel Onyango Ogwang; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Siaya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision 40 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision of Sentence
Outcome
application for revision of sentence dismissed
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Sentence Revision, Grievous Harm, Non Custodial Sentence, Probation Report
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentence Revision Grievous Harm Non Custodial Sentence Probation Report

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ezekiel Onyango Ogwang

Appellant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision of Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the sentence of five years imprisonment for grievous harm should be revised to a non-custodial sentence.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant has shown remorse or taken steps towards compensating the victim to justify sentence revision.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that despite a positive probation report, the applicant had not demonstrated remorse or made any effort to compensate the victim, who suffered serious injuries and opposed a non-custodial sentence. The assault was aggravated by the fact that it was motivated by the victim's testimony in a previous case, amounting to obstruction of justice. There was no provocation from the victim. The sentence of five years imprisonment was lawful and lenient given the maximum penalty for grievous harm is life imprisonment. The court concluded that a non-custodial sentence would not serve the interests of justice or aid in the applicant's reform, and therefore declined to revise the sentence.

Court Disposition

application for revision of sentence dismissed

Orders

  • Application for revision of sentence is dismissed.
  • The convict to serve the full five-year prison sentence subject to remission at the discretion of Prisons authorities.