[2014] KEHC 520 (KLR)

[2014] KEHC 520 (KLR)

The court found that the best interests of the child, as enshrined in Article 53 of the Constitution and Section 4 of the Children’s Act, must be the primary consideration. The applicant, having admitted her mistake and provided reasonable justification for the initial registration, sought to correct the record in...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] KEHC 520 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: F K K; Applicant: K L M; Respondent: The Hon. Attorney General; Respondent: The Registrar of Births & Deaths; Respondent: The Immigration & Registration of Persons
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 3 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling
Outcome
application granted
Judges
REA Ougo
Legal Topics
Child Custody, Birth Registration, Best Interests of Child, Parental Rights
Source Language
en
Family and Children Child Custody Birth Registration Best Interests of Child Parental Rights

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

F K K

Applicant

K L M

Applicant

The Hon. Attorney General

Respondent

The Registrar of Births & Deaths

Respondent

The Immigration & Registration of Persons

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the 2nd applicant's name should be deleted as the father from the birth certificate of A K M.
  2. 2 Whether the best interests of the child require amendment of the birth record.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant's provision of false information affects the relief sought.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the best interests of the child, as enshrined in Article 53 of the Constitution and Section 4 of the Children’s Act, must be the primary consideration. The applicant, having admitted her mistake and provided reasonable justification for the initial registration, sought to correct the record in light of new evidence (DNA test) and the circumstances of the child's conception. The 2nd applicant, whose name appeared as father on the birth certificate, consented to its removal. The court noted that the Births and Deaths Registration Act does not specifically address deletion of a name in such cases, but the absence of express prohibition, combined with the paramountcy of...

Court Disposition

application granted

Orders

  • The name of the 2nd applicant, K L M, shall be deleted and removed as the father in the Birth Certificate of A K M.
  • The 3rd respondent is ordered to delete the name of K L M from the Birth Certificate of A K M.