In the Matter of Baby B [2014] KEHC 7688 (KLR)
- Citation
- [2014] KEHC 7688 (KLR)
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Court
- High Court
- Posture
- Adoption Cause / Judgment
- Case number
- Adoption Cause 180 of 2012
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- High Court
- Posture
- Adoption Cause / Judgment
- Case number
- Adoption Cause 180 of 2012
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court found that the applicants had satisfied all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children.s Act. The child, having been abandoned and committed to a children.s home, was eligible for adoption. The applicants demonstrated financial and emotional capacity to care for the child, and the child had bonded with them. Favourable reports from the Director of Children.s Services and the guardian ad litem confirmed the suitability of the applicants and the best interests of the child. The court held that it was in the best interests of the child to be adopted by the applicants, who would assume all parental rights and duties. The adoption order was therefore granted, with the child to be known as B N M, and the necessary directions given regarding guardianship and registration.
Court disposition
Adoption granted.
Orders
- The applicants, F M M and S N M, are allowed to adopt the child, Baby B, to be known as B N M.
- S N M is appointed legal guardian of the child should anything happen to the applicants.
- The Registrar-General is directed to enter this adoption order in the adoption register.
- The guardian ad litem is discharged.
02
Material facts
Parties
F M M
ApplicantS N M
ApplicantC K M
Guardian Ad Litem03
Procedural history
Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the applicants meet the legal requirements for adoption under the Children.s Act.
- 02
Whether the adoption is in the best interests of the child.
- 03
Whether the child is eligible for adoption as a Kenyan citizen.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The applicants argued that they have fulfilled all statutory requirements for adoption, have the financial and emotional capacity to care for the child, and that the child has bonded with them. They relied on favourable reports from the Director of Children.s Services and the guardian ad litem, and submitted that the adoption would be in the best interests of the child.
- Respondent
- There was no formal respondent; however, the reports from the Director of Children.s Services and the guardian ad litem supported the adoption, confirming the child.s eligibility and the applicants. suitability.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Children's Act (No. 8 of 2001), section 4
The best interests of the child are paramount in adoption proceedings.
- 02
Children's Act (No. 8 of 2001), sections 156, 157, 158
All legal requirements for local adoption must be satisfied before an order is granted.
- 03
Children's Act (No. 8 of 2001), section 170; Constitution of Kenya 2010
An adopted child is entitled to all rights of a biological child, including inheritance.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court found that the applicants had satisfied all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children.s Act. The child, having been abandoned and committed to a children.s home, was eligible for adoption. The applicants demonstrated financial and emotional capacity to care for the child, and the child had bonded with them. Favourable reports from the Director of Children.s Services and the guardian ad litem confirmed the suitability of the applicants and the best interests of the child. The court held that it was in the best interests of the child to be adopted by the applicants, who would assume all parental rights and duties. The adoption order was therefore granted, with the child to be known as B N M, and the necessary directions given regarding guardianship and registration.
Obiter and limits
- The applicants have been made aware that the adoption order, once made, is final and binding during the lifetime of the child.
- The child, being found abandoned in Nairobi, is Kenyan by birth and entitled to all rights accruing to Kenyan citizens.
Court disposition
Adoption granted.
- The applicants, F M M and S N M, are allowed to adopt the child, Baby B, to be known as B N M.
- S N M is appointed legal guardian of the child should anything happen to the applicants.
- The Registrar-General is directed to enter this adoption order in the adoption register.
- The guardian ad litem is discharged.
Source and reliance status
High Court
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
High Court
Judgment
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MILIMANI
ADOPTION CAUSE NO. 180 OF 2012 (OS)
AND
IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILDREN’S ACT
(NO. 8 OF 2001)
AND
IN THE MATTER OF BABY B)
JUDGEMENT
The applicants, F M M and S N M, are a married couple who are citizens Kenya. They have filed the Originating Summons dated 28th August 2012 seeking the court’s permission to adopt the Kenyan female child known for the purpose of these proceedings as Baby Blessing.
Baby Blessing, the subject of these adoption proceedings, is an orphan. She was born on 9th June 2005 and abandoned by her birth mother at Umoja Innercore Estate beside the road. Matter was reported at the Buru Buru Police Station. She was thereafter referred to the Missionaries of Charity Children’s Home. She was later formally committed to that home by the Children’s Court. She was placed with the applicants on 26th November 2006.
This adoption process is being arranged by the Kenya Children’s Home adoption agency, which freed the child for adoption purposes on 16th May 2007 and issued a certificate of even date to that effect.
To facilitate the adoption the applicants have been assessed by the Director of the Children’s Services and the guardian ad litem, C K M. These two have compiled and filed their reports in court dated 27th August 2013 and 24th September 2013, respectively. All these reports are favourable and recommend the proposed adoption. The applicants have demonstrated that they have the financial and emotional capability and capacity to take care of the child. The child appears to have bonded well with the applicants and she considers them to be her parents.
The opinion of this court it would be in the interests of the child that the child the subject of these proceedings is adopted by the applicants. The applicants will be able to provide a home and a family for the child to grow up in and thereafter be a useful member of the family. Consequently, the applicants will be required to execute an undertaking that they shall assume all parental rights and duties of the biological parents in respect of the adopted child; they shall treat the adopted child as if he was born to them. The applicants have been made aware that once the adoption order is made it shall be final and binding during the lifetime of the child and that the child shall have the right to inherit their property. The applicants cannot give up the child owing to any subsequent unforeseen behaviour or other changes in the child.
I am satisfied that all the legal requirements for local adoption have been met. The applicants, F M M and S N M, are hereby allowed to adopt the child, Baby B, to be known hereafter as B N M. I also hereby appoint S N M legal guardian of the child should anything untoward happy to the applicants. The Registrar-General is directed to enter this adoption order in the adoption register. The guardian ad litemis hereby discharged.
The child was found abandoned in Nairobi. She is therefore Kenyan by birth, and is entitled to all the rights that accrue to Kenyan citizens by virtue of the provisions of the Constitution of Kenya 2010 and the Kenya Citizenship and Immigration Act.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this 14th DAY OF March, 2014.
W. MUSYOKA
JUDGE
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.