[2001] KEHC 182 (KLR)
The court found that the petitioner had established, through uncontroverted evidence, that the respondent deserted her without reasonable cause for a period exceeding three years prior to the filing of the petition. The absence of any rebuttal or evidence from the respondent led the court to accept the petitioner's...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2001] KEHC 182 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: F M. M; Respondent: H M. M
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 16 August 2001
- Case Number
- Divorce Cause 88 of 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- petition allowed; marriage dissolved
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Desertion, Dissolution of Marriage
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
F M. M
Applicant
H M. M
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent deserted the petitioner without reasonable cause for a continuous period of at least three years prior to the filing of the petition.
- 2 Whether the marriage should be dissolved on the ground of desertion.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the petitioner had established, through uncontroverted evidence, that the respondent deserted her without reasonable cause for a period exceeding three years prior to the filing of the petition. The absence of any rebuttal or evidence from the respondent led the court to accept the petitioner's account in its entirety. Consequently, the legal threshold for dissolution of marriage on the ground of desertion was met, warranting the granting of a decree nisi to be made absolute within three months.
Court Disposition
petition allowed; marriage dissolved
Orders
- The marriage celebrated between the parties is dissolved.
- Decree nisi to be made absolute within three months of the date hereof.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment