[2021] KEHC 9561 (KLR)
The court found that the petitioner had previously filed a petition seeking resentencing based on the Muruatetu decision, which was heard and struck out by the High Court at Embu in Petition No. 8 of 2020. As such, the current application was found to be res judicata, meaning the matter had already been adjudicated...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 9561 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Fabiano Utuku Mukira; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Embu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Petition 68 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Application for Resentencing
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- LM Njuguna
- Legal Topics
- Mandatory Sentencing, Right to Fair Trial, Resentencing Applications, Cruel and Inhuman Punishment
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fabiano Utuku Mukira
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Application for Resentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the mandatory death sentence imposed on the petitioner was unconstitutional in light of the Supreme Court decision in Muruatetu.
- 2 Whether the application for resentencing is res judicata due to a prior petition on the same issue.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the petitioner had previously filed a petition seeking resentencing based on the Muruatetu decision, which was heard and struck out by the High Court at Embu in Petition No. 8 of 2020. As such, the current application was found to be res judicata, meaning the matter had already been adjudicated between the same parties and could not be reopened. The court therefore dismissed the application for lack of merit, upholding the principle that courts should not entertain repetitive litigation on the same issues between the same parties.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application for resentencing is dismissed.
- No further orders are granted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT EMBU
PETITION NO. 68 OF 2020
FABIANO UTUKU MUKIRA..................................PETITIONER
VERSUS
REPUBLIC................................................................RESPONDENT
RULING
1. The applicant herein filed the petition dated 12th August, 2020. In addition, he filed the notice of motion dated the same date. The court notes that both the petition and the motion seeks similar orders and therefore, I will consider them together.
2. He has urged the court to hear and determine the application for rehearing of the sentence imposed on him on the ground that the mandatory death sentence imposed on him is cruel and inhumane and thus, he was denied his rights under Article 50(4) of the Constitution. The other ground is that the decision by the trial court and subsequently the Court of Appeal were unconstitutional.
3. The applicant herein was arrested and charged with the offence of murder contrary to Section 203 as read with 204 of the Penal Code in Criminal Case No. 23 of 2003 and he was convicted and sentenced to death. He appealed to the Court of Appeal in Criminal Case No. 139 of 2010 at Nyeri and the appeal was dismissed but the death sentence was commutted to life sentence as per the presidential decree.
4. The petitioner, relying on the Supreme Court Case of Francis Karioko Muruatetu & Another Vs Republic argued that the mandatory nature of sentence has been declared unconstitutional and hence he seeks for an appropriate sentence.
5. When the application came up for hearing, the petitioner prayed for leniency and stated that he is remorseful. He prayed that he be given a non-custodial sentence so that he could go home and take care of his children.
6. In her response, counsel for the respondent submitted that the court had already made a pronouncement in Petition No. 8 of 2020 as such the applications herein are res judicata.
7. The court has considered the applications and the submissions by the petitioner and by the counsel for the respondent. I have also perused the court record and I have noted that as rightly submitted by counsel for the respondent, the petitioner herein filed a petition seeking for orders of resentencing pursuant to the decision of Muruatetu and the same was heard and struck out by the High Court at Embu in Petition No. 8 of 2020.
8. In the circumstances, the application herein has no merit and the same is hereby dismissed.
9. It is so ordered.
Delivered, dated and signed at Embu this 27th day of January, 2021.
L. NJUGUNA
JUDGE
.........................................for the Petitioner
.........................................for the Respondent